It's weird how some people on the board react to me posting the occasional tweets from E.
Why is it so important to these people to PREVENT people from reading something
And thinking about it for themselves?
It sounds like there are some people here who want to enforce POLITICAL CORRECTNESS but they want to be the ones in charge.
I simply do not trust people who say, don't read that
And I especially do not trust people who spew profanities.
Red Pill tips
Master the art of questioning and you will find
That people react less violently to your conversations
People do not want to be preached at
But they like to help others, like you, solve a puzzle
So pose a problem to them and ask them to explain
In time they will figure out things, like the MSM are lying all the time.
Give them the space.
But ask the questions.
If this makes you rethink dating AOC
Then you need to check out Paula Shy
https://buceta.com/galleries/2017/02/metart-p-shy-in-revaza-by-erro/index.php
What kind of losers make these fakes anyway?
Not helpful Anon.
Yes, he is misapplying stats from growing corn in field rows, to an environment where he could, if he understood it, grow the corn in beds with nitrogen fixing plants like peas or green beans in the same bed. And if he prepared the corn bed with nitrogen rich fertilizer (dead fish guts?) then it would grow even more in the same space. It also helps to choose traditional varieties that were once native to your area. If you can still find them in a seed exchange or heirloom seed company.
You clearly don't understand how DNA works. Using profane language proves that your argument if grounded in stupidity and lack of education.
Assembling a toolkit?
XRVision Sentinel AI Platform – Face recognition, facial indexing, OCR, LPR, image reconstruction, object classification and detection
IBM Watson – Speech to Text
Cyber Engine – Metasploit Framework with custom payloads
Big Data Stack – Hadoop, Zeppelin, Kafka, Storm, and Spark frameworks
Scripting and Integration – C#, and Python
OSINT and Forensic Tools – Maltego, and Metagoofil
Web Crawler and Scraper – RCrawler with an R package
Network Link Analysis and Graph – Open Sementic Search with a Neo4J plugin
A poem printed in 1812
Have you ever seen this before?
Check the words…
A deep and detailed analysis of who are the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA and their American supporters
The Fifth Column and the Pro-Iran Movement in the US
https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/2020/01/29/the-fifth-column-and-the-pro-iran-movement-in-the-us/
Within hours of the news that the Iranian Quds force commander, Qassem Soleimani, was killed there were over 200 US-wide pro-Iran demonstrations. These well-attended events were organized exclusively by the Red Green Alliance, an amalgam of communist/socialist and Muslim organizations. The bulk of the red part of this alliance was represented by the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) and ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism). The green element of the alliance included a number of Islamic organizations such as CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and several of its affiliate Muslim Brotherhood groups, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), the Muslim Anti-Racism Collaborative, and representatives Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar.
Evaluating the demonstration timeline, it is remarkable just how quickly the activists responded to the call to hit the streets. In the 24 hours between the news of Soleimani’s death on January 3rd and the early morning of January 4th, when the boots were on the ground, the organizers pulled all-nighters, printing and mounting thousands of signs and banners. They also solved complex logistic problems of transportation, food, and communications—all hallmarks of an efficient bureaucracy and well-funded organization.
Running a people count analytic on dozens of videos from these rallies showed large crowds in most of the rally locations. In the event outside of the White House, there were about 1,000 demonstrators; in Boston, around 500; in New Haven, Connecticut, about 150; in Las Angeles, about 450.
In most of these demonstration, their pre-event activity on social media indicated that the ANSWER Coalition had coordinated these rallies with CAIR and other US Muslim affiliates. The analysis of the content of the speeches shows that the majority of the speakers promoted a pro-Iranian political agenda (despite the fact that many of organizations claimed to be non-profits and dedicated to civil rights activity). The common theme across these events was ‘the need to fight the unlawful actions of the United States Middle East and ‘US withdrawal from Iraq’. Listening to these speeches, it seemed that this foreign policy agenda was more aligned with the role of foreign agents than domestic civil rights activists.