Anonymous ID: 925250 May 6, 2020, 2:57 a.m. No.9048688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8701 >>8709 >>8715

Morning anons…

 

Some more smoke to the "engineered" virus theory…Q drop points engineered…

 

LOGIC also points to engineered…

Can you PATENT a NATURAL PRODUCT? Generally NO…

 

If you google "virus patent" it is spammed w/BS…

 

While implying cov19 eligible for a patent, this article goes on to explain why covid19 WOULD NOT be eligible for a patent as a NATURAL OCCURING STRAIN…

 

They modified it and PATENTED IT…

 

https://abg-ip.com/coronavirus-patents/?cli_action=1588757196.442

"However, in other jurisdictions, such as the United States, products of nature not modified by humans are not eligible for patent protection. That is the case of a wild-type virus strain. Therefore, nowadays, it would not be possible for the United States to grant a patent for Wuhan coronavirus or for its isolated genes.

Nevertheless, protection is possible for viruses that differ structurally from the wild-type virus, virus-like particles (VLPs), or viruses obtained by recombinant DNA technology. For example, a genetically modified virus including a gene sequence that is not present in the wild-type strain of the virus could be patentable in the United States. As a result, a live attenuated vaccine based on a virus whose gene sequence includes a mutation that reduces its virulence could be protected in the United States. Diagnostic kits containing reagents that are not found as such in nature may also be protected."

Anonymous ID: 925250 May 6, 2020, 3:03 a.m. No.9048709   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9048688

>However, in other jurisdictions, such as the United States, products of nature not modified by humans are not eligible for patent protection

 

FOR EMPHASIS

A natural product CANNOT be patented…

 

And yet this virus was.

 

ENGINEERED

and validated by the

USPTO