NORMIE COVID-19 RED PILL MATERIAL, 1/2

I have been working on a document for my in-laws to try and ease fears and open eyes about what's really going on. This is written for normies and I tried to include plenty of documentation from trusted/established sources. I thought it might be useful for your own redpill attempts. I also welcome all suggestions for improvement and crafting redpills.

Dear Normie,

I thought I should put together some of the data I was talking about for you to check out. We already know the the media lies about Christians, Republicans, and climate change, or whatever you might agree on. Could they be doing the same think about COVID-19? Here are some things to consider:

WHAT IS THE REAL TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATHS?

• The homepage of the CDC has a link at the top to COVID-19 information. If you click on it, you get their COVID-19 homepage. You can click on “Cases in the U.S.” which takes you here: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

• As I write, it shows the number of deaths to be 68,279. That is a high number, but remember, WITH mitigation, the models showed we would have 100,000 - 200,000 deaths. Original projected deaths: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2020/3/31/21202188/us-deaths-coronavirus-trump-white-house-presser-modeling-100000 US

• So we are far below their best-case scenario, but it still seems like a lot, until you find out that during last year’s flu season, 80,000 Americans died, and we did zero mitigation because while it was a bad flu season, it is still typical. https://www.statnews.com/2018/09/26/cdc-us-flu-deaths-winter/

• But it may be even better than that. Because if you click “about the data” on that CDC coronavirus page, you will find out that the death total includes confirmed AND PROBABLE cases. Wait, what? Is that how “science” is done? This doctor doesn’t think so, who went on Fox News to express his disbelief that the CDC was directing doctors to write COVID-19 on death certificates if they just suspected COVID-19 was the cause. https://www.foxnews.com/media/physician-blasts-cdc-coronavirus-death-count-guidelines

• I was surprised so I looked it up myself. Here are the guidelines; see page 2, fourth paragraph down: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

• The news gets better, though. On a different page of the CDC website, it lists total US deaths from coronavirus again, this time broken down by week. Here the total is nearly 40,000, which is 30,000 LESS than reported on the first page we looked at. Even accounting for a lag in reporting, this seems extreme. And from what I understand, the adjustment made to this secondary, more detailed number was made over night last week. Was it because a lot of “presumed” COVID-19 deaths were taken off the record because this is bad science? I haven’t seen any comment from the CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

• More good news from the perspective of risk to the general population: at appears that HALF of those deaths,20,000 were in nursing homes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/05/04/nursing-home-workers-deal-with-over-20000-deaths-of-residents-questions-raised-about-safety-standards-for-workers-and-residents/#51f4d75b6a7d

• Further, let’s look at the number of flu deaths this year compared to previous years. We were slightly below previous years but comparable, when suddenly the reported deaths took a sharp dive, while COVID-19 deaths began to rise. Interesting. Is this because there is financial incentive to classify deaths as COVID-19? Chart here:
 https://cdn.qmap.pub/images/0cfbc41807f164864433d829c8543f28f92e6f45d6e430fcf7e91a13624c5b42.jpg



• Next is a link to a CDC chart showing the following: COVID-19 deaths; deaths including flu, pneumonia, and COVID-19; deaths from ALL causes; and the percent of overall expected deaths. The overall expected deaths remain in the upper 80’s to mid-90’s percent-wise. How can this be if we are experiencing a pandemic that is killing people by the thousands who wouldn’t have otherwise died? https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/Provisional-Death-Counts-COVID-19-Pneumonia-and-Influenza.pdf

NORMIE COVID-19 RED PILL MATERIAL, 2/2

“FLATTENING THE CURVE”

Do you remember the original goal of mitigation, which was to “flatten the curve”? Flattening the curve doesn’t mean fewer people get COVID-19, it just means we spread out the infections over time so that those very few people who need hospital care will have a bed. The number of people under the curve remains the same, and in fact it is necessary that people get the disease and recover, gaining herd immunity for those who must remain sheltered because of a compromised immune system. So the hospitals have been empty for weeks, many waiting for a “wave” that never came outside of the hotspots. Now we are collapsing our healthcare system by forcing hospitals operate far below capacity, rather than collapsing it by overwhelming it with patients. One example: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/spectrum-health-plans-executive-pay-cuts-layoffs-amid-coronavirus-financial-strain/ar-BB12N848

HEALTH RISKS FROM MITIGATION?

In major lockdown states, they are also pushing “elective” procedures far down the road, but just because they aren’t emergent doesn’t mean they aren’t important. Biopsies and cancer screenings are just two “elective” procedures that are being delayed in some states that may have serious/lethal health ramifications for those people very soon. AND, while they are shoving all that work into the future, some hospitals are laying off staff, so that when things DO open up, they may be less able to handle the influx of delayed procedures. There are other health reasons not to keep people isolated. This is a very interesting man with multiple degrees from MIT including a doctorate in biological engineering. He has a lot to say about the geopolitical forces influencing this pandemic, and the way to protect ourselves by caring for our immune health. https://youtu.be/k05b8aGDCNI

LOCKDOWN VS. SWEDEN MODEL

The goal posts were silently moved from “flattening the curve” to “staying on lockdown until the virus is gone.” That leaves us in a very fragile state, because it means the government can just do this all over again next flu season. I don’t think our economy could survive this level of disruption more than once, let alone the health and wellbeing consequences of isolating people, destroying their livelihoods, and weakening their immune systems. Instead if we follow Sweden’s lead, by next flu season we will have already gained herd immunity, protected the vulnerable, and not tanked our economy or wasted time avoiding our friends and family. Not to mention the effects of isolation, disruption and stress on our immune systems. Sweden: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52395866 Two California doctors discussing Sweden, Denmark, immunology, and further health problems with lockdowns: https://www.bitchute.com/video/oGVRqleTzzMi/

DO MANY OF US ALREADY HAVE ANTIBODIES/IMMUNITY?

In fact, it may turn out that the virus was spreading unmitigated in our community as early as January or February, and in most of the country, it did NOT overwhelm the hospital system. Certainly it seems there were a few specific hot spots like Detroit and New York, which were densely populated urban centers. But even in those places, I can send you links demonstrating that those hospitals were not overwhelmed in the least. Mobile testing sites sat empty, emergency field hospitals were unused and packed up. Here is some preliminary data from Chicago about patients who already have antibodies to COVID-19: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/report-30-50-patients-chicago-tested-covid-19-already-antibodies-system/. It’s something to keep an eye on. Wouldn’t it be great if many of us already had it and now have some immunity?

It is hard to believe that all this mitigation could truly be an enormous overreaction, or something more purposeful, but that’s how it looks from the data. Lastly I’ll just return to this question: Why isn’t the media interested in ANY suggested therapy for COVID-19?

Yours Truly,

FriendAndFamilyAnon

>>9048125

Thanks anon. Yes I will send it via email. It's less visually intimidating with hyperlinks. Brain is fried but will put in edits and also get spouseAnon's permission before launch - kek

>>9048164

Praying for your headache. Time to collapse. Over and out