Anonymous ID: a1d027 May 6, 2020, 12:01 p.m. No.9053666   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3796 >>4053 >>4231 >>4249

Here are the censors, how much power do they have over the 2020 elections?

 

John Samples

Tawakkol Karman

Evelyn Aswad

Jamal Greene

Nighat Dad

Endy Bayuni

Sudhir Krishnaswamy

Maina Kiai

Emi Palmor

Afia Asantewaa Asare-Kyei

Alan Rusbridger

Helle Thorning-Schmidt

András Sajó

Ronaldo Lemos

Nicolas Suzor

Catalina Botero-Marino

Julie Owono

Pamela Karlan

Katherine Chen

Michael McConnell

 

https://www.oversightboard.com/meet-the-board/

 

CALL TO DIG

Anonymous ID: a1d027 May 6, 2020, 12:17 p.m. No.9053871   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4024 >>4053 >>4231 >>4249

>>9053796

https://www.axios.com/facebook-unveils-independent-appeals-board-c0715877-69a8-4a6c-8d46-6b2d596937cf.html

 

How it works: Users who are unhappy with a content takedown or other moderation decisions by Facebook will be able to file an appeal with the board, which will choose a handful of key cases to decide.

 

Facebook says it will treat individual content judgments by the board as binding, but responsibility for implementing board decisions will rest solely with the company.

Board members say they are committed to carefully balancing freedom of expression with other human rights, to operating transparently, and to representing global diversity.

What they're saying: On a press call before the announcement, the co-chairs described their work as novel and experimental and said they expect to make mistakes.

 

"It's one thing to complain about content moderation and the challenges involved in it. It's another to actually try to do something about it," Green said.

One huge challenge will be sifting through an expected firehose of potential controversies to pick the few that the organization will be able to adjudicate.

 

McConnell said the criteria will include cases that affect a large number of users, those that have a major effect on public discourse, and those that have a big impact on policies across Facebook's platform.

History lesson: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg first discussed the idea of a Supreme Court-like independent board in April 2018 as a way to counter criticism that the company was inconsistent and unaccountable in its decisions to take content down or leave it up.

 

In November 2018, Zuckerberg committed to the project publicly, and last year the organization rolled out a charter.