Anonymous ID: e95159 May 6, 2020, 12:23 p.m. No.9053957   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3967 >>3974 >>3976 >>3978 >>3997 >>4003 >>4026 >>4041 >>4071 >>4108 >>4114 >>4127 >>4174 >>4202 >>4205 >>4244 >>4264 >>4297

>>9053890

I am not from any paper, I'm a first year PHD researcher from the University of Bristol studying online subcultures. I realise it's not sensible to approach this community in the form way you are instructed to conduct research due to the nature of imageboard culture. Part of paper revolves around how typical older people engage in online communities outside of the usual channels (Facebook, twitter, etc. etc.)

I recognize I'm going to be flamed for this post but that is completely understandable.

Anonymous ID: e95159 May 6, 2020, 12:35 p.m. No.9054119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4176 >>4199 >>4235 >>4247 >>4252 >>4303

I was under the impression from the research that the Q crowd is typically new to imageboards and there was the following of the usual rules and behaviours common to them. Apologize If I offended anyone >>9053978

Perfectly understandable. However, I am trying to approach this in the most informal qualitative fashion as possible,

>>9054003

Apologies for not being clear, the typification I'm working off is people who only started engaging on anonymous imageboards perhaps in the last few years above the age of 40.

 

 

100% understandable I'm not welcome posting here, after lurking several threads it's quite clear there is a link between the anonymous aspect of /qresearch/ and your own personal twitter? Would you say this is unique to /qresearch/, by this I mean the usage of both twitter for example and a anonymous imageboard?