Anonymous ID: 0f6488 May 6, 2020, 2:10 p.m. No.9055201   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5214 >>5237 >>5252 >>5291 >>5292 >>5358 >>5506

>>9055106

This attack is again me. You can see my reply here:

>>>/comms/>>12960

 

>>9055074

Doc, i'm under attack. Do you remember the snafu with the 117XX breads that were supposed to be 111XX? Being accused of making that honest mistake, which you know is not mine. And which i know was an honest mistake that was corrected several breads later.

See baker meta thread, >>>>12961

This is gonna be a shitshow, fren, hang onto your hat.

  • gyb

Anonymous ID: 0f6488 May 6, 2020, 2:22 p.m. No.9055322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5333 >>5338

>>9055237

TYVM.

Didn't create the qrbunker on endchan, just worked there after departing the other Q board. Now own that board, claimed it in Jan to close it out after it was abandoned. ResignationAnon wanted to index the thread.

Anonymous ID: 0f6488 May 6, 2020, 2:31 p.m. No.9055399   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5545

>>9055358

You are completely outta control.

I own the non-war room board on endchan.bc resignationanon asked for the notables from the last thread and BO had abandoned the board. Claimed it to close out the thread.

Anonymous ID: 0f6488 May 6, 2020, 3:15 p.m. No.9055833   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5855

>>9055659

>>9055671

>>9055681

>>9055677

This is the baker accused of unilaterally changing pb notables. Researching it right now, it's in bread #11181.

 

Ok

there was concern that some pb notables were not wellsauced or outright false, baker discussed with anons; discussion went back and forth about what should be done. Finally, baker asked anons to weigh in and went with their tally. Note also that baker said that "this is an exceptional circumstance. this baker will NOT be routinely changing pb notables." CAPP.