I GUESS GRAVEYARD WOULD BE THE BEST TIME TO REMOVE NOTES
BETTER PUT YOUR EYES ON THIS ANONS
>See baker meta thread, >>>>12961
>
>This is gonna be a shitshow, fren, hang onto your hat.
>
>- gyb
THE BREAD TITLES ARE A SIDE NOTE REMOVING THE BRONFMAN NOTABLES ARE THE MAIN POINT
>I remember when you made a bunker on endchan. I will say you have always been straightforward, level-headed, rational and calm person, thoughful, to work with. I don't understand the beef with you and don't care. Just wanted to say that to you. I also cannot help but notice how you go above and beyond to help new bakers and other bakers - it is noticed by anons, and even though I don't bake, it's appreciated.
>Also, our WarRoom has been totally taken over… again. It is only a mirror now. Not the same topic but related, FYI.
Doc, i'm under attack. Do you remember the snafu with the 117XX breads that were supposed to be 111XX? Being accused of making that honest mistake, which you know is not mine. And which i know was an honest mistake that was corrected several breads later.
Hey Doc, did you know that while the bread title notables were fucked with GYB removed notables related an ongoing dig Q had just posted about related to Cannibal club, Bronfmans, NVIXM.
Don't let the board owner from ENDCHAN sidestep the fact that he removes notables on graveyard
-
Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
>Doc, i'm under attack. Do you remember the snafu with the 117XX breads that were supposed to be 111XX? Being accused of making that honest mistake, which you know is not mine. And which i know was an honest mistake that was corrected several breads later.
>See baker meta thread, >>>>12961
>This is gonna be a shitshow, fren, hang onto your hat.
>- gyb
>You are completely outta control.
>
>I own the non-war room board on endchan.bc resignationanon asked for the notables from the last thread and BO had abandoned the board. Claimed it to close out the thread.
WHY DID YOU REMOVE PREVIOUSLY BAKED NOTABLES BAKED BY A DIFFERENT BAKER ABOUT CANNIBAL CLUB?
WHY DID YOU REMOVE PREVIOUSLY BAKED NOTABLES BAKED BY A DIFFERENT BAKER ABOUT CANNIBAL CLUB?
>0f6488
WHY DID YOU REMOVE PREVIOUSLY BAKED NOTABLES BAKED BY A DIFFERENT BAKER ABOUT CANNIBAL CLUB?
>0f6488
WHY DID YOU REMOVE PREVIOUSLY BAKED NOTABLES BAKED BY A DIFFERENT BAKER ABOUT CANNIBAL CLUB?
>0f6488
WHY DID YOU REMOVE PREVIOUSLY BAKED NOTABLES BAKED BY A DIFFERENT BAKER ABOUT CANNIBAL CLUB?
>0f6488
>Ok
>
>there was concern that some pb notables were not wellsauced or outright false, baker discussed with anons; discussion went back and forth about what should be done. Finally, baker asked anons to weigh in and went with their tally. Note also that baker said that "this is an exceptional circumstance. this baker will NOT be routinely changing pb notables." CAPP.
WHY DID YOU REMOVE PREVIOUSLY BAKED NOTABLES BAKED BY A DIFFERENT BAKER ABOUT CANNIBAL CLUB? STOP AVOIDING THE QUESTION