Thread reader for @DocRock1007 Q linked post
pretty good
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1257003755800756227.html
In the replies:
This is potentially very disturbing, Q, anons!
>https://onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2020/04/27/fauci-knew-about-hcq-in-2005-nobody-needed-to-die
This article is a week old.
The information presented about HCQ is from research from 2005, produced by Fauci's NIH (a gov. org.).
Q posts this as if it were new information to them.
Maybe it is, but since Fauci has been front & center for the better part of 2 months, his background should have been well known to whitehats.
-How many people needlessly got very sick or died?
-How many jobs were lost / businesses closed?
-How many people lost loved ones who they were not allowed comfort in their final hours? (most unconscionable of all things listed, if you've lost someone you will get this)
This open source information could have been made publicly widespread using Fauci's NIHs own research to prevent debunking by MSM.
I find it hard to reconcile that Q team who ostensibly use NSA with their vast resources, would not have been aware of the NIH study on / effectiveness of HCQ, yet the charade was allowed to proceed.
Was POTUS kept in the dark?
Consider this carefully.
Are we supposed to be OK with this type of collateral damage?
Not cool - explanations are required.