Anonymous ID: cc06e4 May 6, 2020, 10:26 p.m. No.9061543   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1562

>>9061507

>Motherfucker, like I told your butt buddy I'm no shill nor a fuk'n troll. But post a video that's been posted over and over and over every fuk'n bread is a bit tiresome. Re read the god damn notables you lazy, fat fuck.

 

Hmm, really when let's review shall we?

 

>>9061406

 

>>>9061393

>

>Bwahahaha…ass tulips. Good ol breadbox's favorite to troll with along with silicone injected cod pieces.

 

>>9061393

 

>LP >>9061218 (You)

>

>Why they promoting a bad site?

 

You said what?? Thinking you are definitely going to need moar paper.

Anonymous ID: cc06e4 May 6, 2020, 10:58 p.m. No.9061737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1760 >>1851 >>1912

Anger: House panel investigating virus response is stuffed with anti-Trump militants

 

A new coronavirus oversight panel assembled by House Democrats is being dismissed as the same old attempt to get President Trump, following the failure of impeachment or the Trump-Russia investigation to end his presidency. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently appointed a select committee on the coronavirus, to be chaired by Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina, a key ally of presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden. The membership was stacked with early advocates of impeaching Trump, including California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters. Republicans have so far avoided participation.

 

“A better name for this committee would be 'Committee of Oligarchs to Unelect the President’ or ‘COUP’ for short,” said Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican. “People want to see us get to the bottom of [the coronavirus] and deal with the economic fallout, not go after the president,” said Rep. Andy Biggs, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Freedom Caucus.

 

A spokesman for House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy described the effort late last month as “impeachment 2.0.” The California Republican is the one who would decide which GOP lawmakers, if any, would ultimately join Pelosi’s committee. “One can expect the worst when it comes to House leadership and this president,” said Tom Fitton, president of the right-leaning watchdog group Judicial Watch. “The goal of this select committee is to set up another impeachment of Trump and protect China.” In addition to Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, the other members are: House Oversight Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., House Small Business Committee Chairwoman Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., and Reps. Bill Foster, D-Ill., Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and Andy Kim, D-N.J. Anti-Trump legal scholar Laurence Tribe praised Raskin as “the best constitutional lawyer in all of Congress” in a Nation article celebrating the Maryland Democrat’s role in the impeachment.

 

Trump’s handling of the coronavirus is under heavy scrutiny, and the public's verdict on his response to the crisis is likely to determine whether he is reelected in November. Vast sums of federal money are being spent to cope with both the virus and the economic damage it has caused, requiring congressional oversight. “But what has happened here that the other committees can’t handle?” asked Fitton. That’s been McCarthy’s question as well. “I want oversight,” he recently told reporters. "That’s why when we passed [the economic rescue package], we created three new entities of oversight beyond all the oversight. So Appropriations has an oversight committee. We have an Oversight Committee itself. This new special committee is under the Oversight Committee itself; it’s inside the Oversight Committee.”

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/anger-house-panel-investigating-virus-response-is-stuffed-with-anti-trump-militants

Anonymous ID: cc06e4 May 6, 2020, 11:07 p.m. No.9061786   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1851 >>1912

Devin Nunes: Look for witnesses who were 'not so truthful' in Russia inquiry transcripts

 

Rep. Devin Nunes said there is no evidence of collusion to be found in dozens of witness transcripts that the House Intelligence Committee is poised to release. Nunes, who is the top Republican on the panel, said the public disclosure of these transcripts will show Chairman Adam Schiff told "lie after lie after lie" to the public about there being proof the Trump campaign was conspiring with the Russians during the 2016 election. "There's not going to be any major bombshells in this because the Democrats already leaked all the supposed bombshells and lied about those bombshells," Nunes told Fox Business host Lou Dobbs on Wednesday.

 

Schiff, who has stressed there was "direct evidence" of collusion between the Trump team and Russia, is now "in panic mode," a senior administration source told Fox News. The California Democrat signaled on Wednesday he would release 53 witness transcripts, which had been unanimously approved for release by the committee two years ago, only after acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell said the redaction and declassification process was complete and he would put them out if the committee did not.

 

Schiff's office pinned the blame on ODNI for the "unnecessary wait," even as GOP lawmakers and Trump administration officials blamed Schiff for the delay. Nunes said the "most interesting" transcripts will be those of interviews with Obama administration officials, which he hinted will expose the Democrats "covering this up."

 

Among them are former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice. Additional witnesses included Trump associates as well as other government and political figures. "I think for good guy side and the real investigators that are trying to get to the bottom of the Russia hoax and who was involved in it, there will be likely people who were not so truthful to Congress, let's just say," Nunes added later. As for when exactly Schiff will release the transcripts, Nunes doubts it will be any time soon because he believes "90% of the media" are "covering this up" and won't hold the chairman accountable. "So you ask when you’re going to see them, I guess if some of the Russia hoaxers ask, 'Hey, are we going to see these transcripts?,' they’ll be out in a nanosecond. If no one does, they’ll delay as long as possible and they'll release them on a Friday night, you know, before Thanksgiving or over Thanksgiving weekend or something," he said.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-look-for-witnesses-who-were-not-so-truthful-in-russia-inquiry-transcripts

Anonymous ID: cc06e4 May 6, 2020, 11:37 p.m. No.9061915   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Nurses’ union using coronavirus chaos to promote 'Medicare for all'

 

For all the harm they do, pandemics such as COVID-19 at least shine a light on the crucial expertise and bravery of healthcare professionals, giving people in the United States the rare opportunity to really pause and consider the heroic job these people do during times of public health crises. Official reports indicate that dozens of healthcare workers have died in the pandemic. This should be a time of mourning and respect for those who have fallen and those still in the line of fire.

 

But leave it to Big Labor to swoop in at such a fragile time and exploit the very real crisis (which has become something of a progressive modus operandi) to advocate for their socialist policy ideas. By muddying the waters and sowing discord in the ranks of nurses themselves, while creating a fictional public opposition to their work, labor unions hope to sell the centralized version of healthcare that Big Labor favors: "Medicare for all." Organized nursing protests are already happening in states around the country organized by the biggest nurses’ union in the country, National Nurses United. Working in conjunction with smaller, state-based unions, the NNU has begun organizing nurses in protests over what they say is a lack of top-shelf personal protective equipment and a flagrant government dismissal of deaths in their ranks as a result of the shortage. The NNU, which calls itself the “largest union and professional association of registered nurses in U.S. history,” released a statement on April 6 essentially demanding “the government act now to give nurses optimal personal protective equipment — including N95 respirators or higher” and to “stop treating nurses as if their lives are expendable.” It is, of course, hard to argue that nurses shouldn’t have the best equipment as they battle on the front lines of a pandemic. And it would be detestable indeed if the American government considered nurses' lives to be without value. It’s hard to imagine anyone disagreeing with those statements.

 

But a deeper read into the release clarifies that the seemingly rational demands are actually a cover for what the NNU really wants: a standardized healthcare provision such as "Medicare for all," a program the union openly advocates for right on its website. The NNU April release gets to the point laboriously, but using typical union language wrapped in panic and discord. “We now bear the full brunt of a healthcare system rendered dysfunctional after years of relentless funding cuts for public health, while generating obscene profits for corporate interests,” writes New York State Nurses Association President Judy Sheridan-González. “Life-protecting, life-saving equipment should have been assembled, trained practitioners should have been mobilized en masse, infrastructure should have been up and running, arming us with the tools to confront the most devastating crisis of our lifetime. And now, late to the game, we must demand that our government make herculean efforts to prevent its spread, to treat its victims, to protect caregivers who place themselves directly in harm’s way, and to pull ourselves out of this abyss — or we are doomed." NYSNA, working in concert with the NNU, was involved in a protest this week in New York in which nurses marched in front of Lincoln Hospital and carried signs reading, “We work sick, you get sick” and “Patients before profits.”

 

Minnesota Nurses Association Executive Director Rose Roach, who is with a group working at the state level on the NNU’s larger protest strategy, is even more direct in her quotes about the ultimate goals of the current nationwide nurses’ protest. “What nurses see is every hospital operating in haphazard fashion,” she said. “No hospital is using the same protocols. No hospital is maintaining the same procedures. They operate differently, day to day, and even shift to shift. For the lives of our nurses, for the lives of our patients, we have to provide the optimal protection for healthcare workers. We need the best. Not the second best. We can’t afford these chances hospitals are taking with our lives.” It's a conflation of two issues, of course: acquisition of quality equipment and standardized healthcare provision. But that’s how exploiting crises works.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/nurses-union-using-coronavirus-chaos-to-promote-medicare-for-all

https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/medicare-for-all