Why are we here?

Why are we providing crumbs?

Think MEMO.

BUILDING THE ARMY.

Not convinced this is spreading?

You, the PEOPLE, have THE POWER.

You, the PEOPLE, just forgot how to PLAY.

TOGETHER you are STRONG.

APART you are weak.

THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED.

THEY WANT RACE WARS.

THEY WANT CLASS WARS.

THEY WANT RELIGIOUS WARS.

THEY WANT POLITICAL WARS.

THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED!

LEARN!

FOR GOD & COUNTRY - LEARN!

STAY STRONG.

STAY TOGETHER.

FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT.

This is more important than you can imagine.

Q

Need a few red pills for family, friends, and others?

Read the #Memo.

Release coming.

Final clearance underway.

Make sure to learn Russian.

Q

What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?

Why did RR [BEG] Ryan to block the FISA MEMO from Congressional review/further advancement?

REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].

TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?

WE SEE YOU.

Q

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-protected-political-embarrassment-not📁

[Why not?] [if true] D's do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?

Why are D's opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?

DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT - why the block?

Define 'Projection'.

See article above - redactions made to 'protect' exposing the REAL TRUTH?

Logical thinking.

McCabe Memos [source] >>NYT [RR] 'wear a wire'

Sessions Subpoena >>McCabe Memos delivery to House

Baker Testimony >>House [what was learned?][D]

[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>House

Locked & Loaded.

Q

[-30]

[-45]

[-60]

[-90]

-Blockade removal ['Scaramucci' model]

-[RR] removal [Goodbye #2 [#1 _ oversight of Mueller]

-[Ohr] removal

-[1-4] removal

-Barr install

-Barr (w/ Whitaker) review [RR] notes re: strong reservations to DECLAS due to sources & methods + Foreign CLAS (irreparable harm) OIG review prior to executing order

-Barr (w/ Whitaker) pull DECLAS review assignment from OIG [cite: executive order from POTUS does not require special oversight - DOJ/FBI (Wray) fully capable in reviewing and commenting re: OP integrity (sources & methods) etc.]

-''Barr executes order to DECLAS + provide members of H committee long requested supplemental documentation in C setting [scope memo + CLAS] as required by US Law.''

-Whitaker remain DOJ senior staff

-Barr meeting Huber & OIG

-OIG report

-House D's threaten subpoena of Barr/Whitaker re: DECLAS, SC report, Huber, etc….

-House D's use subpoena power to ……………………Acts 1, 2, and 3. [spill +30]

-Meeting w/ NK DENUC plan/process > sanctions lift meets subj A, B food for people (aid)

UK/AUS narrative shift re: in_country spy campaign v. POTUS (hops 1 to 2; 2 to 3; 3 to 4; 4 to target)

-D sky is falling push to public (scare to control)(projection)

-Public Awakening

-Narrative damage control

-Placeholders active

-Wall discussion end (public awareness of D's)

-Red/Green Castle per orig plan

Dark to Light.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ📁

Q

AUS, IT, UK co-op DOJ (Barr, Durham, CLAS 1-4)

HUMINT, SIGINT, etc.

Non_FVEY official chan [US senior person(s) req given sensitive nature of 'target' re: presidential nominee(s) - POTUS + Cruz [CLAS 1-4]]

Who gave the order(s)?

Who signed?

Papered per normal NATSEC?

Comms to/from F + Domestic?

''F2F 1-4 US person(s) initiate scope memo.''

US AMB 1 & 2 NSA unmask req.

NSA US AMB 1 & 2 > AUS, IT, UK

[special order per DIR [CLAS 1-9] AUTH unmask per US AMB]

[EACH UNMASKING REQUIRES APPROVAL / SIGN ['KEY']]

C_A domestic assist w/ rogue FBI to avoid US law [non_op domestic]?

C_A HUMINT domestic placement T campaign [1-3 jumps primary target], T WH spy_insertion NATSEC C, personal advisor(s), cabinet?

C_A organized under DNI?

2010 - 2017 [Clapper] [bulk]

2017 - 2019 [Coats] [sleeper/prevent [black op] release of incriminating docs]

Q