The REAL Controllers of Humanity: The Papal Bloodlines

The Real Families, who from behind the scenes, control the World through Religion, Finance, Property, Land, and through control and manipulation of the Markets of the World are the Papal Bloodlines. Not the Rockefellers or the Rothschilds or the Bush/Clinton Regime, those are all lower on the totem pole subservient to the papal bloodlines of the jesuits/black nobility.

This collated information from what is readily available on the Internet and other ‘sources’ should be read in conjunction with additional information written about this subject which helps to clarify a few of the points covered that may otherwise be misinterpreted and misconstrued:

The personages often imagined to be at the top are actually the second level of the human power hierarchy. Yes, the Rothschilds control massive amounts of wealth, but whose wealth is far greater than their own?

'''It would make sense that some of these power structures date back to the height of the Roman

Empire, the founding of The Catholic Church and perhaps back into antiquity, and have moved pawns, Kings and Queens behind the scenes for at least a few millennia.'''

The main family names are:

• Orsini

• Breakspear

• Aldobrandini

• Farnese

• Somaglia

All controlled through the Jesuit Order and their Knights of Malta & Teutonic Knights all based in missile protected Borgo Santo Spirito in Rome.

Pepe Orsini – Italy

Henry Breakspear – Macau, China

This is the true power finally. This is the Guelph and the Ghibelline power over mankind. The Cecil family were controlled by the powerful Jesuit family known as the Pallavicini.

Maria Camilla Pallavicini is far more powerful than Queen Elizabeth II. The Queen and Prince Philip are totally subordinate to the Papal Bloodline the Breakspear Family and their Jesuit UK HQ at 114 Mount Street.

A study of who funded Elizabeth I with an astronomical amount of money to fight the Spanish shows that the funding entity was indeed the Pallavicini family bloodline. The most powerful man right now in the conspiracy over this World is a Roman by the name of PEPE ORSINI of the powerful Roman Papal Bloodline. The Orsini are also known as Orso and the ancient Maximus family.

>>9457892

There is no one more powerful than this figure who is really the Grey Pope. The Papal Bloodlines are the secret shadow hierarchy of the Jesuit Order even behind the Black Pope touted at the #1. These powerful bloodlines are the Breakspear, Somaglia, Orsini, Farnese & Aldobrandini.

You’ll notice David Rothschild marrying into the Aldobrandini bloodline with the pretty, Princess Olimpia Aldobrandini.

Another real head of this is Henry Breakspear who resides now in Macau in China. Many of the Papal Bloodline heads now live in Asia and India. What does that tell you? The Black Pope, Adolfo Nicholas (who had recently resigned) was bought forward for the position due to the Jesuits bringing about of Asia as the next power player of the agenda.

Both this Black Pope and the white Pope aren’t of Papal Bloodline, they are both commoners.

These bloodlines constitute the most powerful families on the planet. The Grey Pope is the one in between the white and black, but unseen, yet controls the left and right hands of the RCC.

Saturnalian Brotherhood – The 13 Jesuit/Papal Bloodlines:

• House of Borja

• House of Breakspeare

• House of Somaglia

• House of Orsini

• House of Conti

• House of Chigi

• House of Colonna

• House of Farnese

• House of Medici

• House of Gaetani

• House of Pamphili

• House of Este

• House of Aldobrandini

The following image is the Coat of Arms of these leading Papal Families:

'''The next in power beneath the Jesuits is the Bourbon, King Juan Carlos of Spain. The Roman Monarch of the World, The King of Jerusalem and SMOM Military Navigator. This is the true World’s power system right now.

Adolfo serves as a military General protecting the Zoroathrianism and Mithraism mystery schools. The Jesuits were created by the Papal Bloodline Farnese during the reign of Farnese Pope Paul III. Loyola was commissioned by Alessandro Cardinal Farnese.'''

The Jesuit general is referred to as the ‘”Black” Pope at the Vatican because he always dresses in black. The Jesuits were officially founded in 1540 by Farnese Pope Paul III. Ignatius LIEola became their first general.

>>9457923

Don Francis Borgia was the great-grandson of Pope Alexander VI, and co-founder of the Jesuits.

On his mother’s side he was descended from King Ferdinand of Aragon. The Spanish control the Vatican through the Jesuits. For the past 500 years, the Spanish Inquisition has controlled the Vatican by means of the Jesuits.

All the Jesuits answer to their general in Rome, and he in turn is content to run the show from behind the scenes, without any publicity or public acclaim so as not to arouse the age-old Italian hostility to the Spanish. The Black Pope is allegedly, to some, the ‘President of the World’, but I doubt this. He is a part of the Arcana Arcanorum controlled by the Papal Bloodlines within the I-Mori.

=These bloodlines are the omega point of control.

These are the Farnese, ORSINI, Aldobrandini, Somaglia & Breakspear. Their war room command centre is within the Borgo Santo Spirito which is missile protected! Henry Breakspear and Pepe Orsini are in high control! Jesuit Assistancy Soldier, James Grummer SJ controls the United States Corporation.

You can find a list of corporations masquerading as countries around the world, by following THIS LINK.

http://humansarefree.com/2018/05/corporations-masquerading-as-government.html

Adolfo, however, is not of the Papal Bloodline; he is a commoner, just like the current Pope!

All of the above mentioned are part of what is referred to as the Black Nobility. The “Black Nobility” are/were the oligarchic families of Venice and Genoa, Italy, who in the 12th century held the privileged trading rights (monopolies).

The “fondo” is the collective financial interest of a “family” of the landed aristocracy, or a “family” of the rentier-financier aristocracy. The fondo functions as a private bank; or a syndicate of several fondi may combine forces to create a jointly controlled private bank or insurance company. The characteristic activities of the fondi involve generating income from speculation on gains from the manipulation of commodity prices – through monopolies – over some portion of trade in a commodity, including raw materials and their means of transportation.

Syndicates of fondi greatly increase their power over society by financing the debt of government. If they are able to establish a relative monopoly of lendable currency, bullion or credit, the syndicate can dictate key policies of governments, including the appointments of government ministries.

Thus they control policies on tariffs, taxation, public works, land concessions, special monopolies, and so on. The “Black Nobility” are/were the oligarchic families of Venice and Genoa, Italy, who in the 12th century held the privileged trading rights (monopolies). The first of three crusades, from 1063 to 1123, established the power of the Venetian Black Nobility and solidified the power of the wealthy ruling class.

>>9457959

The Black Nobility aristocracy achieved complete control over Venice in 1171, when the appointment of the Doge was transferred to what was known as the Great Council

which consisted of members of the commercial aristocracy (among them the infamous de’Medici family). Venice has remained in their hands ever since, but the power and influence of the Venetian Black Nobility extends far beyond its borders, and today it is felt in every corner of the globe.

(Don’t forget, our modern banking system originated in Italy.)

In 1204 the oligarchic family parceled out feudal enclaves to their members, and from this epoch dates the great building-up of power and pressure until the government became a closed corporation (don’t we know this from somewhere?) of the leading Black Nobility families.

The Black Nobility earned its title through dirty tricks, so when the population revolted against the monopolies in government, as anywhere else (aren’t we), the leaders of the uprising were quickly seized and brutally hanged. The Black Nobility uses secret assassinations, murder, blackmail, the bankrupting of opposing citizens or companies, kidnapping, rape and so on… hence their name.

Who are these families today?

There are the:

House of Bernadotte,

Sweden: House of Bourbon,

France: House of Braganza,

Portugal: House of Grimaldi,

Monaco: House of Guelph,

Britain: (the most important one) House of Habsburg,

Austria: House of Hanover,

Germany: (the second most important one) House of Hohenzollern,

Germany: House of Karadjordjevic,

Yugoslavia: (former) House of Liechtenstein,

Liechtenstein: House of Nassau,

Luxembourg: House of Oldenburg,

Denmark: House of Orange,

Netherlands: House of Savoy,

Italy: House of Wettin,

Belgium: House of Wittelsbach,

Germany: House of Württemberg,

Germany: House of Zogu, Albania.

All the families you will find on the Windsor family tree. All the families listed are connected with the House of Guelph, one of the original Black Nobility families of Venice, from which the House of Windsor and thus the present Queen of England, Elizabeth II, descends.

The Guelphs are so intertwined with the German aristocracy through the House of Hanover that it would take several pages to mention all their connections. All (almost) European royal houses originate from the House of Hanover and thus from the House of Guelph — the Black Nobility. The House of Windsor also controls the price of copper, zinc, lead and tin. It is no accident that the principle commodity exchanges are located in London, England. Companies run by Black Nobility families are British Petroleum, Oppenheimer, Lonrho, Philbro and many many more.

Another Black Nobility family are the Grosvenors in England. For centuries this family lived, as most of the European families, on ground rent. Today the family owns at least 300 acres of land in the centre of London. The land is never sold, but leased on a 39 year leasehold agreement — the ground rent of the middle ages. Grosvenor Square, in which the American Embassy is located, belongs to the Grosvenor family, as does Eaton Square.

In Eaton Square apartments are rented out at 25,000 to 75,000 pounds a month (and that does not include maintenance costs). This is to give you an idea of the immense wealth the Black Nobility families garner from ground rents, and why families like the Windsors are not at all interested in industrial progress along with the excess population it supports.

This is the main reason why these ’noble’ families are behind most, if not all, of the wrong-headed pro-environmental movements of the world that ultimately and covertly (of course) aim to curb population growth.

Prince Philip and Prince Charles are the most visible symbols of these movements, and both have often spoken with the utmost callousness about the need to rid the world of unwanted people. [More recently, Prince William argued for urgent depopulation efforts in Africa.]

The Black Nobility are the founders of the secret society of our day from which all the others that are connected to and originated from

— the Committee of 300, The Club of Rome, the C.F.R., the R.I.I.A., the Bilderbergers, the Round Table… all originate from the Committee of 300 and therefore from the European Black Nobility families.

The mass of people on YouTube saying that the Rothschilds have $400 trillion, without even looking deeper into the subject are uninformed! Even the Rockefellers are small potatoes. Yet so many truthers will still claim those families are the most powerful in the world.

Having the power to print money is not where the real power lies; controlling the available resources is!

Source:

http://humansarefree.com/2018/06/the-papal-bloodlines-of-jesuits.html

>>9457995

Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World Wide

Alexander LightMay 12, 2018

Would you be surprised to find a company with the same name as your country registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington DC?

by Andy Whiteley, guest writer

Well, guess what?! Among those listed as corporate entities by the United States SEC are Israel, Turkey, Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Finland, Argentina, Colombia, Brazil, The Philippines, South Korea, Japan, Jamaica, South Africa, Canada, Australia… and my personal favourite (and I quote) “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Alberta as represented by Alberta Investment Management Corp.”

Interesting! So what could all this mean? For the purpose of this article we will follow the example of Australia.

Australia… the lucky country?

SEC Entity Name: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (check out the company’s massive holdings HERE).

SEC Central Index Key (CIK): 0000805157

SEC Standard Industrial Code (SIC): 8880 (UNKNOWN)

SEC Business Address: 1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20036

Fiscal Year End: 0630

Well, that certainly raises some questions!

Why is a company called ‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’ registered in Washington DC? What reason could there be for a country to be registered as a company?

By definition, aren’t corporate and government entities mutually exclusive? And doesn’t government regulate companies?

Why would Australia be registered with the SEC in the United States? And why would it provide a ‘Prospectus’ and annual ‘Economic and Fiscal Outlook’ documents to the SEC? And be subject to SEC regulation?

Why is the Great Seal of Australia a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark Office?

Could the ‘Australian Government’ be a corporate entity masquerading as real government, for profit, and not for the purpose of governance? Does the ‘Australian Government’ truly represent “the people” and not shareholders in another country?

Why do today’s government departments have corporate mission statements like “we provide services on BEHALF of government” and “our CLIENTS include government…”?

What happened to “we ARE government”?? Does this suggest they are NOT true government, but a company masquerading as government?

If a company registered in Washington DC is falsely claiming government status in Australia, what happened to the real (de jure) government with a similar name? And when?

And are the laws in Australia therefore just rules for employees and contractors of the corporation?

Interesting. Let’s look a little closer…

>>9458028

Perhaps it is a requirement that the Commonwealth of Australia registers as a company entity in order to trade with the United States of America.

Are all the other countries who trade with the United States also registered on the American SEC? Is ‘the United States of America’ also registered with ASIC, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission? And is Australia similarly registered with the corresponding trade regulators in other countries?

The answer appears to be NO.

International trade implies mutual agreement; reciprocity; a common method of exchange. But the reality is that the ‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’ is registered as a corporate entity with the United States SEC, but not the other way around. There appear to be no comparable corporate entities registered in other countries with which Australia trades.

And nations ranking among the United States’ biggest trading partners do NOT have corporate avatars registered with the American SEC. Perhaps registration in Washington DC is for the purpose of trading Government Bonds. Interesting…

… But this strange corporate entity is only half the story. Before government bonds can even exist, surely there must first be a legitimate government.

Government and the role of Governor-General in Australia

In Australia, the Governor-Generalis the representative of the Monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) and the Administrator of Government. Given that the Governor-General administers government in Australia, government can only exist in Australia with a valid Governor-General.

The Governor-General is reliant upon the existence of the ‘Office of Governor-General’, which was originally constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent dated 29th October 1900, passed under the Monarch’s seal – the Great Seal Of The United Kingdom (view Letters Patent 1900).

The power and authority to revoke, alter or amend those Letters Patent was reserved by the late Queen Victoria to her heirs and successors. Given those Letters Patent were issued under the ‘Great Seal of the United Kingdom’, surely any revocation, alteration or amendment must be issued by an heir and successor under the same Seal.

So what’s the problem?

In 1984, Letters Patent supposedly revoked the original Letters Patent of 1900 and provided new provisions for the Office of Governor-General (view Letters Patent 1984). This happened under the ‘Great Seal of Australia’, which we already know is a corporate trademark registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office in the U.S. (view registration)

Surely such an attempt at revocation cannot therefore be lawful?

And if not, what Office is the Governor-General in Australia presently occupying? Is the person we call “Governor-General” truly a representative of an “heir and successor” to the late Queen Victoria?

The answer appears to be NO.

Given that the Governor-General appoints Ministers, Judges, Commissioners and Justices of the Peace, and ascribes Royal Assent as the Monarch’s representative in Australia – using the Monarch’s Seal – in the absence of a valid Governor-General, are there any legitimate government offices in Australia?

Again… the answer appears to be NO.

So let’s test the theory…

A case study

Wake Up World friend and colleague Scott Bartle documented his recent dealings with ‘Australian Customs & Border Protection Service’ in his self-funded documentary “What The FUQ? – Frequently Unanswered Questions of the Australian Government”.

This simple, concise and sometimes hilarious case-study follows Scott’s ongoing interactions with a supposed “government” entity that simply does not behave as a genuine government agency should.

And all he did was ask them to demonstrate their validity!>>9458028

>>9458121

Documentary Trailer: What The FUQ? (2:47 mins)

To view this documentary in full, click here. I highly recommended it.

So… IS the “Australian Government” the same government the original Office of Governor-General was intended to Administer?

It’s a question that officials at all levels of “Australian Government” have seem unwilling or unable to answer. Some readers may think I’m a crack-pot for even asking the question.

“Break out the tin-foil hats!” they’ll cry! But please…

Before you form an opinion, ask the Australian Government the same question yourself:

Can you please demonstrate that today’s Office of Governor-General is the same Office that was constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent of 1900?

It is your right, after all. And there are certainly some details that don’t add up. But it gets better….

That’s odd, they certainly don’t ACT like a true government.

At first “Government” may just ignore you. But since anyone claiming government status has a responsibility to prove it, their silence is very indicative, don’t you think?

So push your Government a little further, and see what happens when you really start to question who’s who. Taxes & fines are suddenly waived, and miraculously, licenses & permits are no longer required! And it doesn’t stop there.

Does this sound like the behaviour of legitimate government? NO, it does not. If challenged, does a legitimate government not simply demonstrate its validity and continue to act within its lawful authority? Or does legitimate government exempt that person’s responsibilities and wave them through the gates, quickly, quietly and with a minimum of fuss? “Nothing to see here!”

>>9458151

Is this situation unique to Australia?

Let’s find out! To our friends and readers from the Commonwealth of Australia, we recommend you contact your local Members and Senators and ask them one simple question:

Can you please demonstrate that today’s Office of Governor-General is the same Office that was constituted by the late Queen Victoria in Letters Patent of 1900?

'''To our friends and readers outside Australia, we recommend you identify the documents that established the original offices of government in your country, then ask one simple question of your government representatives:

Can you please demonstrate that today’s government is the same one as established at the inception of this country?'''

It is just one simple question! Demonstrating its own legitimacy is a very simple thing that every government agency should be able to do. And in a true democracy, silence is an unacceptable response of government to questions of its very legitimacy.

Update: Just check this out! Under the “Right to Know,” an Australian citizen has submitted a request to the government and asked them to provide the documents that prove that the Commonwealth of Australia is a legal entity under the Australian Constitution.

They couldn’t, because in fact, The Commonwealth of Australia is registered as a corporation in the USA.

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/is_the_commonwealth_of_australia

>>9458174

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/is_the_commonwealth_of_australia

From: Jim Gray

Delivered March 13, 2013

13.03.2013

Dear Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,

I know that it is my duty to keep you informed of MY WILL on anything that comes before Parliament, or that should come before Parliament.

IT IS MY WILL that you provide me with evidence that the corporation registered in the United States of America as the Commonwealth of Australia

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000805157&owner=include&count=40

is the same organisation as the Commonwealth of Australia, which is authorized in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/c… by the Queen of England and her successors.

IT IS MY WILL that you provide me with evidence that shows where the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution authorizes the Commonwealth of Australia to become a corporation registered in the United States of America.

IT IS MY Will that a referendum be held that gives the electors of Australia the opportunity to vote for or against the Commonwealth of Australia being a registered corporation in the United States of America.

This request only applies if the Commonwealth of Australia, registered in the United States of America as a corporation, is the same organisation as the Commonwealth of Australia that is our Government.

Yours faithfully,

James Gray

Col Chamings left an annotation (March 27, 2013)

The answer to the questions have been evaded with the onus put back on the requester to respond before they supply the information asked for!

From: Jim Gray

Delivered April 13, 2013

Dear FOI,

It is my WILL to know what has delayed a response to my request for information regarding the Commonwealth of Australia being a registered corporation in the United States of America.

>>9449965

> thank fuck we're not American or jewish Jon james Pratt (999) aka the storm

But Australia as you know it was sold in 1984 to the family who runs the USA.

Australia you know today is a corporation registered under the SEC.

Look it up.

You're nothing but USA employees.

They're buying Greenland next, Trump told you so, did you think he was joking.

>>9458215

"Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet did not have the information requested. "

The "Australia Government" cannot prove that it's not a corporation of America.

Aura Blue left an annotation (January 29, 2018)

Perhaps a pertinent question would be as to what date the Commonwealth of Australia was listed firstly.

as of 1972, Whitlam formed a duplicate Government called The Australian Government whereby the name Commonwealth was deleted out of his duplicate copy of the Constitution and has been running as a corporation until today.

The new Government has liberties removed from the People through statutes they have passed. I would be keen to know if the dates coincide and if so we may then have legal standing to dismiss the Australian government and agencies thereof.

Gregory King left an annotation (August 01, 2019)

It is registered as a cooporation and yes it is ilegal

this all started with Goth Whitlam when he ilegally changed the constitution in 1973 Royal Styles and Titles Act and also the Interpretations Act paving the first foot steps then Bob Hawk with his Act of treason know as The Australia Act 1986 however it was Paul Keating that did the registration in 1991 when he did the back door deal with America to devalue the Australian dollar to push up the value of the American dollar putting Australia in the recession Australia had to have its been along plan of treason.

>>9642090

Must be something, because our friendly organic spam bot "Jon James Pratt (999) aka the storm" shows up and starts dumping a mother load straight after.