>>9071324

>>9071309

>>9071349

lb was baked by a clown.

he baked a muh jew propaganda post, he posted the notables so late (650+ posts into the bread) that anons have no time to check and he again left out relevant info.

and prolly a post that made the shills butthurt much was the reason for posting notables so late in the first place - this post:

>>9070616 (lb), >>9070812 (lb), >>9070955 (lb) Is the real DARPA twatter (DoD) tweeting on Q?

The official DARPA twatter engaging Q followers?

(not entirely sure, bc some tweets are very odd, but it´s an account with a blue checkmark, which basically proves it official. also, "officially" saying Q is "far fetched" while actually spreading the word seems just like the think Q would do!)

(also this got attacked by shills quite heavy, before they switched tactics and tried to ignore while not baking, a known pattern used.)

EYES ON.

>>9071349

baker, if you take a bake, you should do what bakers are supposed to do: following the bread closely while checking info and sauce to find the important stuff.

that is the reason for having bakers.

(a baker that takes a bake, when then actually not being here is obviously not here to help.)

>>9071512

I posted something very relevant. DARPA (DoD) engaging Q followers.

what happens? you attack me for posting that info.

what happened lb? baker left it out. baker baked a clown post. baker posted notables very late so anons could not check them before being baked, baker ghosted the bread (while right now there are plenty of bakers shitposting in /comms.

really nothing more to say.

will just repost the info that shills so strongly signaled is 'over the target'.

>>9071713

sure, very credible, bc anons who are here to help Q would of course filter anons posting info on DARPA twatter engaging Q follower….suuuure.

>>9071764

account has a checkmark, so whoever is twatting (person not relevant), it´s the official DARPA (DoD) account used (much relevant!).

>>9071757

it was sauced lb.

and actually finding @darpa on twatter is not exactly hard anyway - as it´s not one specific tweet that seems important, but pretty much all they have been tweeting recently.

>>9070616 (lb), >>9070812 (lb), >>9070955 (lb) Is the real DARPA twatter (DoD) tweeting on Q?

>>9071349

>>9071843

sure baker, bc of course any baker that isihere to find and spread relevant info would immeadiately filter anons posting on "DARPA engaging Q followers"….yeah….does not make you look like a clown at all.

and calling me a name as your best argument does not exactly show strenght.

>>9071967

thanks anon.

>>9071982

baker took the bake, say he is "multitasking" though, does not do what a baker is supposed to do, also does not hand off but wants to be a gatekeeper, leaves out most relevant info, has 20 posts already.

nothing more so say.

besides maybe one thing: will repost.

>>9072018

ok.

>>9072062

DRAIN IT!