Check out Q4139. There are multiple levels of meaning here, and I'm not sure if anyone has tried to bring them all together yet. (Some anons dug into some parts I know… )
First, Q is obviously responding to anons on the board who complain that Q routinely links to twitter accounts instead of replying to posts from anons who may be working on the board every day and might have already posted the same stuff. QR is not intended for everyone, but both anons on the board and those who work via other means are crucial.
Looking deeper, the twitter account Q linked to reinforces the UNITY angle, but on another level. The twitter banner highlights the fact that the poster was a lifelong Democrat (until the Podesta/Clinton emails). Q is reinforcing the idea that this isn't about Republican vs Democrat. Trump has taken control of the Republican party (which includes criminals, some still due for justice), whereas the Clintons ARE criminals, and none of this has to do with reasonable disagreements about economic policy or such things.
But… while the particular tweet Q linked to relates to the tweeter's banner, it has nothing to do with Q's ostensible point in his own post. The tweet is from Feb 16, and doesn't relate to any recent events at all. Instead, the tweeter is praising James Comey for his actions in 2016. Q does not link "random" tweets even when the focus is "rah rah"… all the rah rah tweets feature rather authentic individuals being themselves while supporting a broader cause. Q must have picked this particular tweet in part due to the actual content of the tweet. And here I'll jump a few steps before filling in the gaps: I think the reason for this is that Q is revealing that Comey is a white hat, and moreover, since this is a full reversal for Q, this suggests everything is about to go down.
For the last year or so, Comey has been the most reviled figure in Q posts, at least when it comes to humor. But even that is a tell. Comey figures as the villain in multiple humorous posts, but not so much in the posts suggesting dark justice.
Let's look at the options: either Comey is a central DS player who perverted the course of justice, or he is a total white hat who actively worked to keep up that appearance. He might, in the past, have seemed a naive and bumbling careerist bureaucrat, but who thinks that now?
The crucial events are the two HRC email inquiries. We know now that BO works in collusion with the enemy, and would never have allowed a proper judicial resolution. Most of us did not fully grasp that then (me included). What did Comey do? Concluding the first inquiry, he pretty much stated outright that HRC was guilty, and then said that a reasonable prosecutor would not bring charges. That makes sense, since no reasonable person wants to get Arkancided. But a reasonable observer would have concluded that there was some coverup (leaving aside the issue of whether Comey was involved in it or revealing it). Then, less than two weeks before election day, Comey announced a second investigation, only to close it several days later. It should have been obvious to anyone paying attention that there was a complete mismatch between the attention to detail and duty suggested by Comey's letter announcing this, and the sudden closure far before any real inquiry could have been completed. I remember this myself, and was ecstatic thinking that they were going to nail that evil bitch, and then was utterly flummoxed at the closure. There was obviously a coverup, but it was not clear then whether Comey himself was good or bad.
Now recall the setting in 2016: many Americans believed that they had been stuck with two very bad major party candidates. While Trump was having success connecting with some of the "apolitical" via his authenticity, many potential voters of a "serious conservative" bent were disenthused with his apparent egotitism and lack of gravitas. And at the same time, many Democrat-leaning potential voters already disliked HRC, since she is obviously an evil bitch. Comey didn't need to convert HRC voters into DJT voters. But he could and did likely convert many potential HRC-voters into non-HCR-voters and many potential non-DJT-voters into DJT-voters (abstaining and voting for 3rd-party candidates were real options…). And so James Comey seems to be one of the figures behind the scenes who played an absolutely crucial role in preventing the need for Plan Z.
Let's toss this in too: the second HRC email inquiry opened on 28 Oct 2016. What happened on 28 Oct 2017? Or what two things, as Q has emphasized?
Upshot: Q4139 is outing Comey as a white hat.