>>9076059 (pb)

>Crownstrike CEO's 'Russian Hoax' testimony - [They] had NO 'evidence' of a DNC hack

>>9076123 (pb)

>https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/sh21.pdf

There's moar to this Shawn Henry testimony.

1 - Answers the Congressman's question regarding the "conspiracy theory from so-called 'experts' that the files were directly downloaded" that he consulted with his team who are "top experts in the area" who said it was "not plausible". Doesn't elaborate. Commits a logical fallacy - appeal to authority.

2 - Admits that CrowdStrike has provided intelligence services to the FBI in the past UNDER CONTRACT.

3 - Describes the method under which an actor could mimic Russian intelligence by acquiring Russian command-and-control servers and specific malicious code.

Then dismisses the possibility as "not plausible" again without further explanation.

4 - Suggests that the DNC emails could have been copied by "taking screenshots". Congressman wonders how hundreds of thousands of emails could have been copied in such a manner in real time that ended up being released to the public.

If these are the bases for their conclusions, their arguments are flimsy as hell.