Anonymous ID: 13256c May 9, 2020, 12:14 a.m. No.9090599   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0629 >>0630

How [Y] influences the news cycle.

 

LdR wants to use this "terrible pandemic" to "reform capitalism."

Case in point of how [Y] is directing the puppets in our midsts and steering us toward their one-world socialist government.

 

The standard for this "reform" is "transparency." The early call for transparency was from this loudmouth-

Dems seize on 'slush fund' to oppose Republican rescue package

Senate Democrats ripped a GOP proposal to give the Trump administration $500 billion in funds for companies with little oversight.

 

“We’re gonna give $500 billion in basically a slush fund to help industries controlled by Mnuchin with very little transparency? Is that what we ought to be doing?” asked Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii.).

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/23/democrats-slush-fund-republican-rescue-package-143565

 

 

Public Comms from LdR on Apr 29 - May 1, 2020

Ma[Y] Da[Y], a [Y] Holi-Da[Y]

 

May 01 Initiation Night

May 01 Beltane fertility festival

http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_date.htm

 

Thinking that public comms via op-ed is required since, as I believe, their comms are now belong to Q (must be hard sleeping, Lynn).

 

The Argument in Two Parts:

 

Opinion Corporate culture

Title: Companies that tap US relief packages must be more transparent - The public deserves to know how they will protect the wellbeing of their employees, customers and the planet

 

by Lynn Forester de Rothschild

 

https://www.ft.com/content/0ffcba84-892b-11ea-a109-483c62d17528

 

&

 

Covid-19 will change capitalism forever, says Lynn Forester de Rothschild

Lynn Forester de Rothschild, founder of the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism, says that companies that tap U.S. relief packages must be more transparent about how they will protect the well-being of their workers and customers. She joins “Squawk Box” to discuss.

Fri, May 1 20207:33 AM EST

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/05/01/covid-19-esg-capitalism-business-bailouts-forester-de-rothschild.html

 

Essentially, since government helps private industry during crisis, private industry owes "the public" greater transparency on how it is responsive to employees, customers, (get this) community, and the environment.

 

Social/Economic "Inclusion" (social justice) and "sustainability" (Agenda 21-Global governance) are achieved through enforced accountability.

 

Since the public/private "quid pro quo" relationship is established, historically (great depression etc.), whereby the government has assisted private industry, private industry was then required to give a greater account of itself to "the public" through government standardization of accounting practices.

 

Today, the "terrible pandemic" is also such a case. With the $500B rescue package, we can now require private industry, through a new government body, to account for it's social responsiblity of "inclusion" and the "environment".

 

This argument echoed by media and our shill-ified "public servants."

 

This, 2 days after LdR's article.

 

"US rescue plan must be transparent, consistent and fast

Taxpayers ought to receive a share of the upside after big business recovers"

Gillian Tett April 2 2020

https://www.ft.com/content/23981a90-74d9-11ea-ad98-044200cb277f

 

And, see all things Green New Deal.

Anonymous ID: 13256c May 9, 2020, 12:16 a.m. No.9090629   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9090599

>>How [Y] influences the news cycle.

 

this related and relevant

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtuous_circle_and_vicious_circle

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_of_silence#Public