The WHO has been failing for decades. And might be connected to the biblical locust swarms!
"WHO’s Failings: Time for a New UN Health Agency?"
Very interesting article on the WHO's failings:
https://theeconomicstandard.com/time-for-a-new-un-health-agency/
The author is calling for a new UN health agency. Is it a politically correct way of saying the WHO should be closed, or is he part of the DS?
I do not know. However, this article present some good facts about the WHO, that are not commonly reported. It could be a good source for further digs.
1) It provides a potential explanation to why Q was pointing us to the locust epidemics: it seems to have been happening as a result of policies mandated by the WHO regarding insecticides (in red in the screenshot).
2) The WHO is a bureaucratic machine pushing for state-controlled public health systems in poor countries, even if they cannot afford it, and it opposes most private sector involvement (in purple).
3) The WHO cannot police its member state donors (e.g. China), and has become a purely bureaucratic machine, driven by political turf wars (in green).
4) Even UN administrators have know this for decades. The WHO is so bad, that in 1994, they went around it regarding AIDS (in blue).
Regarding point 4), maybe some critical thinking is warranted. There could be another reason why the UN created UNAIDS instead of going to the WHO, keep that in mind.
However, all in all, that the WHO is a complete failure has been apparently well known for everyone in the know for decades. You don't read that in the MSM!
Further links provided in the article:
The pesticide, the forbidding of which is the cause of locust invasions, works. Also, potential source of diggs, it is also related to malaria, as HCQ!
"DDT works"
https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/ddtworks
Some brave souls managed to have the WHO allow for the use of DDT in 2006.
"WHO gives indoor use of DDT a clean bill of health for controlling malaria"
https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2006/pr50/en/
However, that did not last long: 1 year later, the WHO did a 180, and it was prohibited.
"The Rise, Fall, Rise, and Imminent Fall of DDT"
https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/the-rise-fall-rise-and-imminent-fall-of-ddt/
The CFR's (Council on Foreign Relations) explanation on why Taiwan is excluded from the WHO. The CFR is turning against the WHO regarding Taiwan. What's up with that?
"Why Does the WHO Exclude Taiwan?"
https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/why-does-who-exclude-taiwan