Covid-19:
What They Don’t Tell You
http://mileswmathis.com/covid.pdf
Please read
Haven't done a full dig on this, not sure if it has been addressed in the past. If so please disregard. But looking into Q posts I noticed an oddity with the filename on pictures attached.
For example:
Post 456 has a name of: 72E0C7D9-EB8A-49A7-8367-1190ACAD8F9F followed by the appropriate image file type. How does this relate to anything? Well disregarding the filetype and utilizing a normal search I couldn’t find anything. However, when you look at Wikileaks.org and specific categories you will find something interesting:
Going to the HRC Email Archive you can see an Email-ID search option:
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/
Searching the name of the file as an email-ID directs you to an E-mail.
https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult
The interesting thing is that the filename works for the other Email-ID stored archives:
Podesta
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult
AKP
https://www.wikileaks.org/akp-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult
DNC
https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult
If the filename works for the HRC Archive it seems to work for the other three. Now some of these filenames won’t propagate a response from WikiLeaks, I am assuming that they may be in reference to either one of the other categories, or perhaps another search engine entirely.
Is Q pointing us to these emails, via the email-ID search function on Wikileaks?
Is Wikileaks changing the ID after the Q posts?
Not sure which way this is going, perhaps Q could give an answer.
I just have to ask, what are the odds that these filenames would reference these emails in the Wikileaks database, and on the ones I checked, reference four separate archives. Seems pretty low to me.
The posts that I have checked that work are: 456, 684, 685, 686, 865, 868, 880, 892… at this point I moved into further posts to see if it was still happening…1951, 2721, 2729.
Anyhow, I thought you would all be interested.
Mueller’s Investigators Worry They’re Going to Get Sued
August 4, 2017
CNN’s Evan Perez, Pamela Brown and Shimon Prokupecz, report that special counsel Robert Mueller’s ever-growing team of investigators, 16 lawyers and counting, are worried they’re going to be sued by those they are investigating:
CNN has learned some of the investigators involved in the probe are buying liability insurance out of concern they could become targets of lawsuits from those who are being investigated, according to one of the people familiar with the probe. The Justice Department covers legal fees for employees sued in the course of their duties, but some of the lawyers want extra protection.
The Justice Department and special counsel’s office both declined to comment on the liability concerns.
Take the report with a grain of salt because it is based on unnamed sources “people familiar with the probe.”
==Why would 16 hot shot lawyers, not to
mention the other 20 investigators and staff, fear being sued so much they felt they needed to buy the extra protection of insurance when the Justice Department will cover their legal fees for being sued for performing their duties?==
Could it be that they are going so far afield in the investigation that they fear they may be found to be acting outside of their duties?
https://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2017/08/04/mueller%E2%80%99s-investigators-worry-they%E2%80%99re-going-get-sued/
Q
so they go all in?
Valerie Jarrett: 'No chance' Michelle Obama will be Biden's VP
Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has committed to choosing a woman as his running mate. But an Obama family confidante on Tuesday said there’s “no chance” that woman will be Michelle Obama.
Valerie Jarrett, a former Obama White House senior adviser, took a hatchet to the recent speculation that the former first lady would consider joining the Democratic ticket with Biden, who served as her husband's vice president.
“The reason why I'm being so unequivocal is that there just simply has never been a time when she's expressed an interest in running for office,” Jarrett said in an interview with The Hill. “She’s not demurring here. She’s not being hard to get. She doesn’t want the job.”
The conventional veepstakes wisdom has been that Biden’s shortlist includes Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) as well as Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D).
But the former first lady’s name has recently been floated as a politically savvy vice presidential option. Biden further fueled that theory recently when asked if he would consider choosing Obama, who, according to Gallup, was America’s most admired woman the past two years.
“I’d take her in a heartbeat,” Biden told Pittsburgh’s KDKA on Monday. “She’s brilliant. She knows the way around. She is a really fine woman. The Obamas are great friends.”
But Jarrett said that’s wishful thinking — and Biden himself said he didn’t believe Obama would accept the role if offered.
“Of course he would take her. That’s not the question,” Jarrett said. “The question is, is this the way in which she wants to continue her life of service?”
The former first lady is currently focused on a voter registration effort she launched in 2018 called When We All Vote, which has enlisted the help of “Hamilton's” Lin-Manuel Miranda, country music stars Faith Hill and Tim McGraw, and singer Janelle Monae.
Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the voter registration push has gone virtual, with Obama teaming up with DJ D-Nice and others to host online "#CouchParty" events. But the former first lady's aim of “changing the culture around voting” remains the same, Jarrett said.
“There is a difference between being a public servant and being a politician, and she has no interest in being a politician,” Jarrett said. “Her husband was interested in being both. She’s only interested in the service component.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/494009-valerie-jarret-no-chance-michelle-obama-will-be-bidens-vp
WHEN WE ALL VOTE
Who We Are
When We All Vote is a non-profit, nonpartisan organization that is on a mission to increase participation in every election and close the race and age voting gap by changing the culture around voting, harnessing grassroots energy, and through strategic partnerships to reach every American.
Launched in 2018 by co-chairs Michelle Obama, Tom Hanks, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Janelle Monae, Chris Paul, Faith Hill and Tim McGraw, When We All Vote is changing the culture around voting using a data-driven and multifaceted approach to increase participation in elections.
In the months directly before the 2018 midterm elections, When We All Vote organized 2,500 local voter registration events across the country, engaged 200 million Americans online about the significance of voting, and texted nearly four million voters the resources to register and get out to vote.
And we’re just getting started. We’re helping bring even more people into the voting process because when we all vote, we all do better.
https://www.whenweallvote.org/about-us/
Michelle Obama goes all in for full-scale absentee balloting nationwide and challenges Donald trump's claim it favors Democrats saying there is 'nothing partisan' about keeping voters safe
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8213953/Michelle-Obama-group-backs-expanding-voting-options-2020.html
Clinton Foundation Discusses creating Army Of “Contact Tracers” to Monitor Citizens who had COVID-19
The following video was leaked from The Clinton Global Initiative.
Former President Clinton, Governor Cuomo, Chelsea Clinton, Governor Newsom, discuss hiring an army of unemployed people or college students to contact people who have been tested positive for COVID-19 in order to learn about where they have been, who they have engaged with, visited etc.
” This is going to require an army of folks, the capacity of consideration from individuals to allow for their privacy to be impacted by that kind of acuity of attention based upon where they’ve been and who they talked to ” Governor Newsom