Anonymous ID: 87b096 May 9, 2020, 6:15 a.m. No.9092932   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2960 >>2963 >>3045 >>3183

Does anyone know or think it was possible that WikiLeaks was already compromised at the Time SETH RICH handed over the thumb drive to them? They deep six him (the source) and already got Gucifer 1.0 to self censor and disavow his claim of hacking so they could lay the groundwork for G2 and the Russia hack narrative? If so did they deliberately selectively leak the emails prior to DNC convention to bolster the narrative? If you think this is nuts say so with respect or else I will roast your fucking ass. The is just spit balling and no I'm not a fucking shill, retard.

Anonymous ID: 87b096 May 9, 2020, 6:35 a.m. No.9093082   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9092963

Thanks! There's an interesting article about G1 (read it awhile ago) and as I recall it said how the dirty FBI got him to plead to a lesser charge if he would drop his claim that he was the guy who hacked. That time frame G1 (spring 2016) to G2 is an interesting one. G2 is definitely a phony, smells like Deep State bullshit.

Anonymous ID: 87b096 May 9, 2020, 6:41 a.m. No.9093116   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3224

>>9092960

exactly, that's what I had always envisioned (internal DNC IT forensics pointed to SR). But after reading about G1 and knowing WL was compromised at "some point" in time I figured hell maybe the compromise goes further back. Also a recent drop as I recall intimates to this re SR/WL hand-to-hand (did he hand the drive to a mole?). I guess we'll see..