>>9091200 (PB)
Obama's children are grown. So, who is calling to their "Mommy"? It sounded like a young female under 10 and there are no such children in the Obama household. The breathing on the mic is not coordinated with his.
Some kind of fuckery? WHERE is he "calling it in" from? There is at least one female of child bearing / rearing age present.
>>9090800 (PB)
Was Obama even present for that call? Or are we listening to a recording made elsewhere and played back for the microphone, allowing extraneous noises (breathing, child) to enter the tape?
Hmm … the leaker has a child and the phone was on speaker and using a second device to record the call. Do we want to dox the leaker, though? Obama has a history of plugging leaks permanently.
Brackets are not [kill boxes] … they are [focus here] boxes. If (generic you) look at them as kill boxes, you are going to be confused when those people continue to breathe. They breathe in. They breathe out. They have lunch and the limo continues to take them wherever they need to go. [Sessions] in brackets does not mean that an assassin has been dispatched … it means to focus on what he is doing, dig as needed, analyze what is known, project future probabilities. Plug him into the map, plot his influence and probable future trajectory. Do the same for those influenced by him. Follow the ripples in the pond as far as we can.
Does "Trust Sessions" mean that WE should trust him or that the opposition trusts him? Digging deeply enough will tell us which, but quick conclusions have lead us down many winding path toward error and disappointment. Always have. Always will. Some, at least, of those quick conclusions are deliberately planted by the opposition. Far too many of them are our own fuckups. We've all seen Anons go off chasing rabbits that not only can't be caught, but that don't NEED to be caught. Meanwhile, we completely miss the fox ransacking the hen house.
Q recently reminded us ( <<9083833 ) that his team can assist us, but ONLY after we come up with things organically. For a while we were doing that – that's ultimately what got us shut down for 93 days at a VERY CRITICAL time.
We are assured that that technical vulnerability has been overcome. It's time (and past) to get back to a much higher level of technical proficiency with our news gathering and, most importantly, analysis. Your observation about being led astray is correct – we'd be far better off if more Anons reflected as you have.