dChan
Anonymous ID: fc43d1 May 10, 2020, 12:53 a.m. No.9106699   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6748 >>7069 >>7177 >>7377

>>9105924, >>9106011 cont'd from pb - COVID testing is mandatory for those on gov assistance. LB/PB >diggz

 

Cali testing location webpage was launched May 6, same day as the Social Services letter.

 

https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OPA/Pages/NR20-076.aspx

 

The tesing webiste is to provide location information and appointments. Along with the testing task force page it links, there is no statement of mandatory testing.

 

The Cali Public Health Dept provides guidelines on testing (pic related).

Standard guidelines, healthcare workers, high risk, and those with symptoms. There is no indication that persons on benefits atre considered at risk. The testing guidelines do specify or provide a link for mandatory Social Services Department testing.

 

https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/Expanding-Access-to-Testing-Updated-Interim-Guidance-on-Prioritization-for-COVID-19-Laboratory-Testing-0501.aspx

 

If anything, it implies that testing should be for those in need at high risk and overhelm the testing facilities. If all family members receiving benefits must be tested by the June date, that would be millions of test samples taken, processed and documented. The system could be overhelmed.

 

Appears the Social Services "MD" signing the letter is a power hunger tyrant with shit for brains - reason he is a bureaucrat behind the desk rather than practicing medicne (but the public is still at great risk from his incompitent conduct).

Anonymous ID: fc43d1 May 10, 2020, 1:13 a.m. No.9106748   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6751 >>6831 >>7069 >>7177 >>7377

>>9106699

 

No mandatory requirements from May noted on the Social Services webpage either. Would think that would have been posted.

 

"All County Welfare Director Letters (ACWDLs)" links for May concern the stimulus relief benefits and no testing requirements if on benefits. (quick read only)

 

So if benefits are dependant on testing, more likely that it would violate federal law,

 

18 USC 246: Deprivation of relief benefits

 

Whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive, or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work, compensation, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief purposes, on account of political affiliation, race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

 

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section246&num=0&edition=prelim

 

Would recommend the Social Services "MD" signing the letter and associated directors be prosecuted.