NOTABLE FROM LB

Hey Baker, I didn't have time to check for you before end of last thread, but no, has not been notable'd before, just came out 2 days ago and I checked on wearthene.ws and not there.

>>9107680 Full Interview Transcript of AG Barr Discussing Dropping the Flynn Case

If you want a repost, if that anon is here he can repost here, or someone else can repost it here for you.

Thanks, baker.

>>9108369

cool, ty. it's important.

>>9108406

Why are you here?

Serious question.

>>9108469

>comes into direct contact with COVID-19 positive person… and immediately changes the rules.

>Dr. Fauci plans to attend Senate hearing on Tuesday…

>>9108499

>Interpretation: Fauci is probably under house arrest and will be out of the public eye!

No. It means he's really in a pickle - he has to admit he's been taking a prophylaxis (CHQ) that works, or he has to spin & "modify rules" so he can do the hearing and continue working against POTUS and for [them].

Consider in context of Bill Kristol's tweet posted last thread:

POTUS has been exposed, must "step down"

• VP has been exposed, must "step down"

= PRESIDENT PELOSI

Do you see the conundrum they are in now?

Of their own making?

>>9108663

>Question is then why redact them at all?

Sources & methods protection.

>Unless the 1-99 is a list of names to be enacted on by something.

Don't want to give a head's up so evidence is destroyed.

Sealed indictments.

jmo and I do agree with this >>9108573

>>9108523

I had previously only seen the weird graphics about the Roths, intimating that he had been raped by one or more of them. Ok, understandable if a bit obsessive to post every single day in every thread he's in.

But adding in the BS about Flynn today. I didn't realize it's the same person. I don't understand the connection between the two at all.

>>9108523

I don't understand why Gowdy just named off senior officials and "cautioned Republicans" that those "are high enough to embarass the previous administration"

Hmm

I'm not ascribing motive, but it seemed like he was saying, warning Rs (obliquely) not to go all the way up to Obama.

>>9108776

Can you cite the post please?

>>9108746

>What Pentagon officials tendered resignation within a 2 week period?

Should not be difficult information to find.

>>9108744

>I am reliably informed that the NSA or its partners intercepted at least some of the communications between Mr. Rich and Wikileaks. Before elaborating on that,

kek

>>9108894

No one will know what that means.

Hashtags have to be easily understood by everyone to be effective.

>>9108952

It just has to be readable, understandable to virtually everyone. If it is short, the full words of the acronym can be used next to it