>>9108976 (lasto breadu)
CLAS 1-99 also comes up on the Epstein security cameras. Again, IF it is a list of names and not a code then Anons would be able to cross reference people from Epstein's flight logs and FBI agents for instance.
>>9108978 (lb)
Shouldn't there be a record of the patent then if that was the case? Approved or no.
noteable
test2
I don't get why a conductor though. There are much worse things someone could patent.
From a semi-conductor? Makes no sense.
We don't even know who's at the very top. You can list all sorts of names like Payseur and Lichtenstein but it starts to get dark up there.
>[Wheels Up] flight logs [CLAS 1-99] under investigation by FBI/DOJ?
>Rooms indicate size. Hallways shown? [CLAS 1-99]
Is it implicating people linked to Epstein's island though
I don't buy it. 1-99 was being dropped recently, more likely that it has to do with new spygate. Implicates Epstein contacts which are publicly known.
[F] to indicate foreign would be deemed more of an agency threat, no?
Only thing I can think of is if this semi-conductor was used to hold electrostatic pulse current over electromagnetic.
Was either code or a list, code was more likely. But those mentions are still pointing at a list of names.
There's barely any context to that either. Redacted noun could be a corporation, individual.
No.
Most likely this. But do the previously redacted names with [CLAS 1-99] have a common thread that link to a single operation/case like you say, or is it just that '1-99' is just code and doesn't implicate anyone to a specific case?