Anonymous ID: 63d582 May 10, 2020, 3:40 p.m. No.9113791   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Well, well, well

 

Rachel (see tangled web) Martin Jul-2019 interview of Entous

 

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/01/737535435/new-yorker-examines-hunter-bidens-business-and-personal-struggles

 

ENTOUS: I think, you know, it's the appearance of a conflict of interests that I can point to rather than an actual, real conflict of interest. Some of the accusations that have been flown - thrown about, including that Biden used his personal office somehow to protect his son or to advance him, I see no credible evidence to back that up.

Anonymous ID: 63d582 May 10, 2020, 3:54 p.m. No.9113951   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4444

Terry Gross NPR interview of Entous.

 

https://www.npr.org/2020/02/06/803355747/killing-of-iranian-general-opens-up-new-frontier-in-assassination-journalist-say

 

February 6, 2020 • New Yorker writer Adam Entous says the U.S. could face further retaliation from Iran for the death of Qassem Soleimani: "If you look at their history, they take a long time before they strike back."

Anonymous ID: 63d582 May 10, 2020, 4:34 p.m. No.9114444   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4454 >>4458 >>4468 >>4472 >>4475 >>4485

>>9113951

 

Ha, "Well, John Brennan said"

 

ENTOUS: As part of the interviews for the story, I spoke to John Brennan, who was in charge of some of these operations under the Obama administration. He explained that, you know, you can get a lawyer to say that something is legal, and that doesn't mean that it is. So different administrations, different lawyers interpret these rules, these executive orders in different ways. And that's what's happened over the years.

 

There's been a consistency in the way it's been interpreted after 9/11, that the targets have been members of terrorist organizations. But the Trump administration lawyers, when they looked at the Soleimani case, decided that he could legitimately be killed because of his involvement in alleged planning and plotting against U.S. forces.