Look at the first sentence "Sunlight is the best disinfectant,.." Flynn was talking shit in his court docs. Source https://sidneypowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/109-Brief-in-Support-of-Motion-to-Compel-and-Show-Cause.pdf. Conclusion is on page 17.

VIII. Conclusion

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and no court can do justice until it knows the truth. To restore any measure of trust and credibility in our law enforcement institutions, the government must be held to the highest standards. See, e.g., United States. v. Harvey, 791 F.3d 294, 300 (4th Cir. 1986) (citation omitted). “[C]oncerns for the honor of the government, public confidence in the fair administration of justice, and the effective administration of justice in a federal scheme of government”demand it. Id.For these reasons, Mr. Flynn requests that this Court(i)issue an order to show cause why the government should not be held in contempt because of their violation of this Court’s Standing Order and their legal and ethical duties to produce exculpatory and impeachment evidence to the defense; (ii) thereafter find the prosecutors in contempt of this Court’s Brady order;(iii) issue an order to them and to the Department of Justice to preserve all evidence, emails, notes, documents, texts, cell phones—including those of the Special Counsel team—and (iv) order the Department of Justice to produce all evidence the defense requests in our accompanying Motion and any and all other Brady information in the government’s possession.

The material edits made to the 302 of Flynn's interview. https://sidneypowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/D135-MTF-Sursur-reply-Mot-Comp-Brady-11.4.19.pdf

Page 9

We do know that the same evening, Strzok went into the office, picked up Page’s edits,and made changes that any reasonable person would deem material to the 302. He added a definitive statement: “FLYNN stated he did not.” This was in response to whether, on the issue of UN vote, Flynn had asked Kislyak to vote in a particular way. This is materially different from the notes which state Flynn did not recall speaking to Kislyak on the UN vote issue. Another material change was to add the entire phrase: “or if KISLYAK described any Russian response to a request by FLYNN” to which Flynn answered “no.” The notes reflect neither a question nor an answer about a “Russian response” to anything at all.

In case you were wondering what Flynn's original lawyers conflict of interest was. They were the ones that fucked up Flynn's FARA registrations. https://sidneypowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/D135-MTF-Sursur-reply-Mot-Comp-Brady-11.4.19.pdf

Page 15

While Mr. Van Grack admits he was aware of the serious conflict of interest inherent in Covington & Burling’s representation of Mr. Flynn in this case because of its responsibility for the FARA registration.