>>9116793 (PB)

Are these images in the correct sequence? Because here is what I got off CM's page less than 5 minutes ago.

>>9117617

Yeah, the post I was responding to had switched the sequence so that 1.17 looked to be the more recent count. I was trying to politely tell him not to bother with that "stuff" because there were already a couple responses which seemed to indicate that @Jack had manipulated the count.

>>9117728

I wonder how it responds to wedges in the hip and shoulder joints.

>>9117768

It sounds like there is perhaps a war going on back on the Twitter servers.

>>9117867

Nice place. Might be up for sale again soon.

>>9117952

This is as much fun as watching the first 24+ hours of that video about a week ago.