Anonymous ID: 533b7b 1/2 May 15, 2020, 10:12 p.m. No.9196449   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6504 >>0965

Whipped this up earlier, will have to be in 2 posts b/c about 2,900 characters:

 

Why the unmasking of General Flynn Matters

 

In the frenzy of unmaskings by Obama administration officials in the waning days of his presidency, the majority of those officials had no 'need to know' who the American citizen was on the call record in the NSA database. Neither was their unmasking the American citizen's name for the purpose of creating an 'intelligence product.'

 

While those are unusual and unwarranted acts, they are not, in and of themselves, illegal. What was illegal was leaking the American citizen's on that phone call name to the media. That person's name was classified.

 

The Obama administration sought out staff leakers and punished leakers more than any other in US history, according to the Washington Post [1], even to the point of using lie-detector tests on staff [2]. The irony of the same administration accessing and leaking classified information to the media at the last moment is palpable.

 

The leak of General Flynn's name to friendly media was strategically timed and to a certain effect: to poison the good name and reputation of a lifelong patriot who served America for 33 years in the US Army, and to set into motion the plan to overthrow the incoming president.

 

Once General Flynn's name was published in obsequious media, connecting him with the Russians, and libeling him as a 'Russian asset' in Trump's incoming administration, the stage was set. As one, on cue, worldwide media trumpeted the talking points that not only was Trump not fanatically against Russia, but he had advisors who were already plotting with Mr. Putin, to do what, none would say, but it had to be something nefarious.

Anonymous ID: 533b7b 2/2 May 15, 2020, 10:18 p.m. No.9196504   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9196449

>>9196449

The 'Russian collusion' narrative was promoted on every channel, on every show and on every newspaper's pages. No where in the thousands of lines of text or hours of panel discussions was the fact that it was the unmasking and illegal leaking of an American citizen's name done by people who absolutely knew the laws about classified information.

 

No mainstream journalist or reporter pointed out the illegality of that leak and the danger it posed to all American citizens with respect to our right to privacy and unreasonable search and seizure.

 

If a dedicated American Patriot like Gen. Michael Flynn could be unmasked and his name leaked to the media in order to destroy him, it could be done to any of us.

 

The danger of abuse of power like this, at the highest levels of American government cannot be overstated.

 

It is time for the American public to know the truth: who illegally leaked this name to the media. It is time for blind justice in this matter, for we cannot continue in a system where there are two sets of rules and laws are only applied to others.

 

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/06/08/trump-rages-about-leakers-obama-quietly-prosecuted-them/

[2] https://cpj.org/reports/us2013-english.pdf

Anonymous ID: 533b7b May 15, 2020, 10:26 p.m. No.9196571   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Feel free to edit however necessary/desired, and to preempt any concerns about the citations, the Post was used specifically because it is leftist and very pro Hussein, which makes it 'acceptable' as a source for those who are/may be skeptical. If the Post said Hussein was the harshest, then it is very different than somewhere like Breitbart saying it.

 

I'm able and available to write - give me a topic and angle and I'll work on it. It's helpful to know also length desired, number of sources (I didn't embed links, used footnote style) etc.

 

And there is no ego in collaborative projects. Once it's put on the table, it belongs to everyone involved - the only thing that matters is the best quality output. "Bleeding all over it" is a familiar term. Anyone who edits/proofreads will know this term and chuckle.

We should chuckle. Humor makes the work go better.

Anonymous ID: 533b7b May 16, 2020, 11:38 a.m. No.9201491   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1621

>>9201050

It was both slander and libel, actually.

And yes, ty for that, I have been around quite a while and never happened to have seen that so it appeared to be for a person, since it was capitalized like a proper name. It alarmed me there for a minute.

Anonymous ID: 533b7b May 16, 2020, 7:06 p.m. No.9205985   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7265

Ok, well, let's get some topics to cover and get busy.

Where shall we start?

What does the public really need to know right now?

-topics

What's the most important thing the public needs to know right now?

-priorities

Anonymous ID: 533b7b May 16, 2020, 10:55 p.m. No.9208009   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8139

>>9207265

I agree with the priority and topics, and breaking it down to points.

I'm a little confused because I thought we were to start writing right now?

I've never worked on any campaign so I'm not clear on what is needed. Like a single column in a brochure (like 100 words or less) or article for Op-Ed or longer article.

In short, how long and detailed.

I can write whatever is needed in whatever format, I just need to know what you're looking for and I'll get busy.