>>9126940

>>9126964

>>9126996 <When are Congressional Lawyers and Congress Members going to formally pushback?

>>9127351 < A form of pushback?

>>9127117 < My thoughts too

>>9127328 <Location, location, location?

>>9125701 (pb)

>>9125894 (pb)

>>9126780 (pb)

Q: Should Anons look into who is primarily behind led this effort to collect DOJ names?

We All anticipated Pushback. Here are the Key statements (highlighted) we think are important!

>Why such a discrepancy on this issue with such a large number united against Barr?

>Is this a legal divide, a political divide, or an ethical divide? (Think: ruling)

>What is the next countermove?

>[What do lawyers do?] <Tie up in legalese and potential Higher Court ruling.

Anons: Wondering if it would it be worthwhile to categorize (for public awareness purposes) the signatories?

>>9127453

Ooops…forgot to post pict of highlights from subject article.

https://medium.com/@dojalumni/doj-alumni-statement-on-flynn-case-7c38a9a945b9>>9127453

>>9127510

Thank’s for helping us think this through, Anon!

>Still trying to digest it let alone reason it.

We have tons of issues with diplomatic immunity, so Congressional immunity must have its own set of escape hatches.

It seems reasonable that those that are charged with making laws, should have some sort of accountably regarding all laws (particularly those laws were are discussing), right?!