Anonymous ID: 9f641e May 11, 2020, 1:08 p.m. No.9127095   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7110 >>7152

>>9127015

"Going Forward in Order to Look Back"

is about looking into the past

 

so the tweet doesn't match the commentary

matches more to "news unlocks the map" than "psychics tap into the future"

Wouldn't it be more like tapping into a tech which helps one plan? "military planning

the future is open, that why "D Day" didn't name a day. They had to be open for contingencies?

Anonymous ID: 9f641e May 11, 2020, 1:16 p.m. No.9127203   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9127129

so the Federal Government has to do it?

Or a new case

wait til the shit comes out on Schumer, Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein.

Public temper will change and peeps will demand the limits

then it can be done "with the consent of the people"

perhaps a National Referendum?

Anonymous ID: 9f641e May 11, 2020, 1:28 p.m. No.9127342   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9127285

i think the "2000" is not a real number of former officials?

Unless that's how many were cleaned out

it's a code, as they put in public for coms

It's symbolically the 2000$ per month for everybody for life - that the dems are promising the public?