dChan
Anonymous ID: 76778c May 11, 2020, 9:54 p.m. No.9135585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5609 >>5611 >>5671 >>5742 >>5754 >>5780 >>5807

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/05/11/prepare-to-discover-that-michael-flynn-was-not-unmasked-but-everyone-else-was/

 

Prepare to Discover That Michael Flynn WAS NOT Unmasked – But Everyone Else Was…

Posted on May 11, 2020 by sundance

 

It appears we are about to find out if one of my long-standing theories about surveillance of Michael Flynn is correct. Flynn was not “unmasked”, because he was the direct target.

 

For three years the official media account of how the intelligence community gained the transcript of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn talking to Ambassador Sergey Kisliyak on December 29th, 2016, surrounded “incidental collection” as a result of contact with an agent of a foreign power.

 

Meaning the Flynn call was picked up as the U.S. intelligence apparatus was conducting surveillance on Russian Ambassador Kisliyak.

 

If this version of events were accurate (it’s not), it would fall under FISA-702 collection: the monitoring of a foreign agent (Kislyak) who has contact with a U.S. person (Flynn).

 

In order to review the identity of the U.S. person, a process called ‘unmasking’, a 702 submission must be made. As NSA Director Rogers said: that submission, the unmasking, leaves a paper/electronic trail. However, I do not think that is what happened, here’s why:

 

Back in 2017 Senator Lindsey Graham questioned former DAG Sally Yates and former DNI James Clapper. Within the questioning, Sally Yates tipped her hand. There was never an unmasking of Flynn because Flynn was a target; it was not incidental collection.

Anonymous ID: 76778c May 11, 2020, 10:06 p.m. No.9135742   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5779 >>5780 >>5807

>>9135671

>>9135585

 

…Does that make sense now?

 

When candidate Trump brought Lt. General Michael Flynn into the campaign, he essentially brought in a person who was under an ongoing FBI investigation.

 

Everyone that Flynn then came in contact with then became a “U.S. Person” identified in the intelligence reports. Those U.S. Persons were then unmasked.

 

That’s why so many unmaskings.

 

If my long-standing hunch is correct, we’ll soon find out.

Anonymous ID: 76778c May 11, 2020, 10:09 p.m. No.9135780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5807 >>5843 >>5974 >>6118 >>6190

>>9135671

>>9135742

>>9135585

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/05/11/unmasking-101-you-must-make-that-request-in-writing-grenell-has-declassified-bill-barr-will-release/

 

Unmasking 101: ..”You Must Make That Request In Writing” – Grenell Has Declassified, Bill Barr Will Release…

Posted on May 11, 2020 by sundance

 

FULL BACKGROUND – However, a strong note of caution. Sometimes the specificity of the intelligence operation itself means the U.S. target will already be named in the originating intelligence document and would not require an unmasking request.