Are the Secret Societies evil, or is the need for secrecy evil? The knowledge of something is wisdom. Many have been martyred for what they know. Is hiding what you know, from the public, to prevent being exterminated, inherently evil?
Is the secret club (less that 10) who built, "The Plan" inherently evil. Think anon. Logic.
The fear of death at the hands of another begets the innovation of secrecy. Necessity is the mother of invention.
Anon is just trying to make the distinction.
Is secrecy inherently evil?
Obviously not. We all keep our business to ourselves. We all keep secrets.
Of course, killing babies and eating them is beyond offensive to our entire cultural belief system. That practice should absolutely, unquestionably, be exterminated.
But, anon and anon were able to have this entire convo because of a massive pile of secrets, and secrets societies, joined together informally, hopefully for GOOD.
Broadbrushing Secret Societies as evil is dumb.
Many men, of many societies have done evil. Many men, of many churches have done evil in the name of God.
Individuals commit crimes. Human sacrifice is the crime we're really talking about. Who's committing those??
Planned Parenthood or the Masons?
The Cabal or the Knights of Columbus?
Lions club?
Order of Oddfellows?
Shriner's Burn hospitals and hospitals for crippled children?
St. Jude's is connected to the Vatican which has a metric fuckton of secrets…they bad too?
This is their book. Worth a review to understand their tactics.
Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals is a 1971 book by community activist and writer Saul D. Alinsky about how to successfully run a movement for change.
The Rules
"Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."
"Never go outside the expertise of your people."
"Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy."
"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."
"A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."
"Keep the pressure on."
"The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
"The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."
"If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside."
"The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
"All Secret Societies" is not a valid target. In order to freeze a target, it has to be Named. We call it "The Cabal". But it is still not named or frozen, so they are still hiding behind the entities they've infiltrated and corrupted.
Par example: The Masons were infiltrated by Prince Hall. IIRC, Prince Hall was a slave who hid in the rafters and memorized the Lodge rituals. Then Prince Hall started his own Lodges and started making Masons. These Masons were not all of the same moral character and corrupted many of the lodges into a mafia style mutual benefit society. Now, Prince Hall was a slave tryna get free, good on him. What followed was something different.
Not all organizations who share symbology are equal, or the same. I think it makes us look stupid to point the blame at the wrong things. The evil that oppresses the earth is our enemy.
Yep, whoever "Names It". Owns it.
ObamaGate was a huge success at "Owning it". That's an example to be followed. When "it" really gets well "named" it will be well "owned".
As more targets get painted and fired upone, the image of the larger organization at work will reveal itself to The People. We need the hearts and minds of the people to direct their energy as accurately as possible towards the enemy. The correct enemy.