>Q has not indicated one way or the other on Gowdy.
false
>Only newfags or shills would take a Q drop at face value and believe it settles an issue.
You misunderstand. I did no such thing.
I just proved that your assertion is false.
>Disinfo… FISA goes both ways
possible, but my assertion was merely to prove other [idiot] anon's assertion that Q had not given us an indication. Q did indicate. I proved that indication exists.
Whether or not Q's indication is factual or disinformation is up to each anon to discern for themselves.
boy are you in for an adjustment.
>I'm surprised they [White House Correspondence Association] don't make her ask questions remotely.
She is there by invitation of the White House. WHCA has no say in it - they can't keep her out.
and they will be more wrong than wrong has ever been wrong.