The following is from the spreadsheet. Everyone is encouraged to go through it. Yes, it's a little brutal, it's not sleek & sexy like the other sites but it has the info that anons found, that is not stored elsewhere.
It is a wealth of knowledge YOU NEED to understand.
Begin at the beginning:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g
(This will be a multi-part post)
10/28/17 >>147023341 https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/146981635/#q147023341
>What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld: While Congress did not authorize military commissions, they left open the possibility of executive (presidential) formation of such.
"Although the ruling was a defeat for the government in the specific case, it seemed to confirm presidential powers to form military tribunals
http://www.4lawschool.com/case-briefs/hamdan-v-rumsfeld"
10/29/17 >>147175452 http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147146601/#q147175452
>Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.
"The Insurrection ACT allows POTUS to use military (& National Guard) as police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act
ALL OF WHICH HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST 8 MONTHS OF TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY. Specifically, the Las Vegas massacre was a great opportunity to impose these powers – 911 style, esp. since the cover story crumbled so quickly. The fact they didn't intervene suggests there is something going on behind the scenes." "Under provisions of both the Homeland Security Act, Military Commissions Act(s), and The PATRIOT Act, the POTUS, either via his sec, or by sending armed troops to halt the attempts to resist launched by pseudo state operative Elaine Duke, current Secretary of Homeland Security, may engage in any number of activities to halt treason by forces hostile to the United States within the Armed Forces, or cease an entire Dept of US Gov from its compromised authority. These were checks and balances to the usurption and abuse of US internal policy which, as in the case of some Sept 11 Attackers whose visas were not thoroughly vetted, where these bureacratic practices could amount to ""holes"" in the US statuatory armor. Also, the Pat Act gives Potus the authority to declare any group hostile to US ""terrorists"".
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/the-patriot-act.html&ved=0ahUKEwi5lZrC57vXAhUm6oMKHQ_9DtUQFggsMAE&usg=AOvVaw3ZZbNiz5OhLr-k9nNy8Yt3
At that point, under PATRIOT Act detention is legal, and under the Military Commissions Act of 2008, the tribunals are now engageable." Under Article 2 of the US Constitution, the Presidency is granted control of the Armed Forces. Few SCOTUS cases limiting this in regards to Habeus Corpus apply in the cases which are emerging here EXCEPT that the defendants are involved in High Treason. Then, Article 2§2 clause 2 of the US Const grants the President the right to suspend habeus corpus, when it is cited in conjunction with Military Commissions Acts which have resulted in Miltary Detainee Acts. Once their defences reach this point, they will be sunk. Presumably in the first motions.