[Whew! no 666]
TYBKEK!
I'm 333… so only half evil!
> RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) testing, currently used to diagnose active infection by detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material, overestimates infection rates. For an accurate account of COVID-19 prevalence, we need to test for antibodies
antibodies tell us little if anything.
Judy is still butthurt over the HTLV-III sample stolen from Luc Montagnier when she was 25.
Everything still is based on the Lab artifact formerly known as HTLV-III whose name was changed to HIV. The fact that Gallo renamed it doesn't suddenly turn a PROVEN Lab artifact into an actual disease etiology. The science is still Shit. Judy is still butthurt and I'm ashamed of Dr. Mercola for endorsing the LAME Idea that serological tests will tell us ANYTHING at all. They won't. Neither will rt PCR (real time, not reverse transcriptase… although it is true they are looking for Reverse transcriptase which is actually NOT proof of a pathology presence but instead proof of DNA retranscription (healing process) taking place.