>I was completely convinced, but then without proof, someone gave me another reason. And now I feel like an idiot for not trusting authority…
>If you don't ever meditate then you're hackable right now because your sub-conscious is undefended
Holy fuck !
When did this place turn into pseudo science granny corner ??
I was just pointing out you blatant attempt at emotional manipulation.
…
First I have to accept you idea of "brain-hacking".
Then I have to accept that somehow meditation defends me against your idea of "brain-hacking".
Just because you said so ?
It's quite the leap my fren. Heard of sauce ?
>Meditation allows you direct participation in your sub-conscious. Want to know whats in there? You have to actually look.
This ^
This is what you fail to provide any evidence for.
I'm more or less on board with the rest.
>YOU WANT ME TO MEDITATE FOR YOU?!
Yes please. Ought to be fun.
>How the hell do I prove something experiential?
What you are claiming is not experiential. It a testable effect.
You are telling me I can create a metaphorical forcefield for protection against hacking.
You must be able to explain how that would work (at least).
>SIT STILL FOR SEVERAL HOURS AND REPORT BACK
I'm a programmer… it's what I do…
Does that mean I am unhackable now?
>Now I understand why you can't parse abstract concepts.
Kek. End it out with an insult. It's a good way to show that you had a sound argument.
Have a nice day.