DNC Communications Director 'Xochitl Hinojosa' has a total and complete meltdown when asked simple basic questions.

Q: "Is it a crime to talk to another country, is that against the law?"

DNC: "Well, erm, when you're trying to interfere in an election…blah blah blah"

Q: "There was a suggestion in your answer that there was collusion. There is no proof of that. Where's yours."

DNC: "Political games!….Barr!….Politicized Justice Dept!…American People!"

Q: "One more time, where's the proof about collusion."

DNC: "Well, I'll leave that to the investigators."

Q: "It's 2020."

DNC: "…"

WELCOME TO THE DEMOKKKRAT PARTY

LYING PIECES OF SHIT

>>9158650 (/lb) __ Q4232 "The Hook"

>Nov 30 'unmask' needed justification?

>WHO SET UP THE MEETING?

>WHO WAS DIRECTING AMB. KISLYAK TO MAKE CONTACT [MEETING + PHONE]?

👀

Did…did the Q team arrange for a PERFECTLY LEGITIMATE phone call between Kislyak and Flynn on Dec 29, 2016…to serve as "The Hook"…to…"fish"…EVERYONE WHO WAS ALREADY SPYING ON FLYNN/TRUMP?

This is how it may have played out.

Flynn/POTUS knew they were being spied on, illegally.

So how do you "hook" them into a trap?

You arrange for a phone call FROM Kislyak to Flynn, KNOWING that 'they' would JUMP ALL OVER IT, because they needed an excuse to justify all of their previous illegal spying, including since at least Nov 30, and likely earlier.

"The hook" was set. Get a "Russia Russia Russia" official to make contact with Flynn, and then sit back and watch EVERYONE ON THE RECENTLY DECLASSIFIED LIST POST-DEC 29, 2016 scramble and panic and make unmasking requests on Flynn because they thought this was their moment to "prove" there was collusion!

Do have it correct, Q?

>>9159460

And after…