Anonymous ID: 4dc2ec May 13, 2020, 3:10 p.m. No.9159638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9850

Anons we have more than we know

 

'''Who knows who David Ignatius' source was?

 

>>9158650 (PB) rt >>9158507 (PB) ————————— WHO WAS DIRECTING AMB. KISLYAK TO MAKE CONTACT [MEETING + PHONE]? (Cap: >>9158751 (PB) )

 

Who has been following this who remembers?

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/02/flynn-resigns-timeline/516594/

https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/02/15/david-ignatius-curious-role-in-the-mike-flynn-story/

 

archive is blocked here. can someone archive?

Anonymous ID: 4dc2ec May 13, 2020, 3:34 p.m. No.9160025   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0202

>>9159949

Jared is a rat who defends his rat father. Thinks that his family should be above the law and his crimes should be ignored, just like all the other elites.

 

Explain to me why I should respect someone who's mad at the rule of law being followed? Explain to me why I should respect this person and want him negotiating AMERICAN Middle East policy?

 

Why doesn't he go and work for Israel? I don't go to his country and shit on his people.

 

Fuck him.

Anonymous ID: 4dc2ec May 13, 2020, 3:46 p.m. No.9160271   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9160202

Why do shills never actually argue the facts? Why do they always just attack the person?

 

>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

>Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them.