Anonymous ID: dcb883 May 13, 2020, 4:07 p.m. No.9160629   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9160541

Rumor has been that the DOJ pulled strings to get his son out of a scrape, which means he owes favors forever after. Someone posted about this yesterday.

 

Pics refer.

Anonymous ID: dcb883 May 13, 2020, 4:25 p.m. No.9160896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0979

>>9160458

My take is that Qs question is a red herring. Dec 28, 2016 Obama signs an EO for sanctions against R for “election meddling,” which also results in the expulsion of 35 diplomats.

 

It’s hardly surprising that R’s ambassador to the US would immediately reach out to the appropriate person in the incoming administration to discuss the matter. That’s what ambassadors are for; not to have done so would constitute dereliction of duty.

 

I’m not sure that anything prompted K to call F, other than the announcement of the EO.

 

K would likely call Flynn, because it was already known that F was to be appointed Nat Sec Advisor; and who better to call at that point?

Anonymous ID: dcb883 May 13, 2020, 4:36 p.m. No.9161063   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9161018

We see your better solutions around the country and in Nancy’s shiny new mystery bill.

 

We will not stand for any of it.

 

You are going to pay for what you’ve done and what you’re doing.