Is durham the rook?
(King + Queen) vs. (King + Rook)
Is durham the rook?
(King + Queen) vs. (King + Rook)
baker wtf
That chinese rocket didn’t narrowly miss NYC, it fell of the coast of africa.
Wtf
crickets from the media
for fucks sake
Q said the queen protects the king
attached article about Graham saying he won’t call obama
Graham is protecting obama
(Queen) is protecting (obama)
Get your head out of your ass
By that logic, it could have hit anywhere in the upper US/ lower canada, across its path in 30 min.
Narrowly. It’s like someone saying they were in jersey on 9/11 and narrowly escaped.
Regardless. The Chinese government are asshole.
kings don’t finish off pawns or anyone for that matter in chess
rooks/castles, even pawns, but not kings.
I understand your logic here, and it would make sense for grassley to come in swinging. But in this case, graham would have to be a rook, and grassley a king and the move would be called “castling”.
Now if graham is a queen, he can be sacrificed and a pawn can be made a replacement queen via “promotion”.
But still this doesn’t make sense in the context Q posted unless killary is the queen. In order to have that make sense, we need to figure out how Hillary is “protecting” obama.
I’m just not seeing it. She may be a “queen” but not “the queen”.
Occam’s razor states that the simplest explanation is the most likely to be true.
In that case, Q is saying Graham is a “Queen”, which is also a side-joke about him being gay, and he is protecting the king (obama).
That is the simplest explanation here that falls within the context and doesn’t rely on twisted framing to result in an unfinished or unresolved deduction (showing proof that hillary is protecting obama).