Anonymous ID: fa14e8 May 14, 2020, 12:44 p.m. No.9173285   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3466 >>3673 >>3706

(Possible Decode)

==[1 of 22] [22 OPs] = [Stay-Behind Shadow Gov OPs]==

POTUS Tweet (22-O) = Signal Winning 22 to Zero over [O]?

Q !UW.yye1fxo No.47

Jan 21 2018 14:06:20 (EST)

 

Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?

1 of 22.

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b189f8 No.130638

Jan 22 2018 21:47:32 (EST)

 

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?

What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?

Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].

This is only the beginning.

Be careful what you wish for.

AS THE WORLD TURNS.

Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?

Read those two drops carefully with this in mind:

[22] = [Deep State OPs] - Being run by [Hussein's Shadow Presidency.

[22] = Number of different identified [OPs] the [Stay-Behind Shadow Gov] is running.

 

Think about it:

1 of 22

[22] = What?

What would Sessions have dropped the hammer on?

Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22] ←[DS][OPs]

This is only the beginning.

  • [Russia set up] = only [1 of 22]

  • [Assassination] = was [2 of 22]

  • [Impeachment Hoax] = was [3 of 22]

etc..

POTUS tweet:

22-O in my endorsements of Congressional Candidates this season.

[22-O] = Double meaning

22 to 0(zero) = Winning

Winning = 22 to [O]bama

That's my humble take after chewing on this all this time.

And having a future proves past perspective.

Anonymous ID: fa14e8 May 14, 2020, 1:12 p.m. No.9173673   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3713 >>3767

>>9173285

And then there's this.

 

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b189f8 No.130638

Jan 22 2018 21:47:32 (EST)

 

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?

What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?

Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].

This is only the beginning.

Be careful what you wish for.

AS THE WORLD TURNS.

Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/14/lindsey-graham-obama-testimony-russia-258170

 

Graham shoots down Trump's call for Obama testimony on Russia probe origins

In recent days, President Donald Trump has mounted an aggressive campaign against his predecessor.

 

“I don’t think now’s the time for me to do that. I don’t know if that’s even possible. I have grave concerns about the role of executive privilege and all kinds of issues,” Graham said in a brief interview. “I understand President Trump’s frustration, but be careful what you wish for. Just be careful what you wish for.”

"Be careful what you wish for."

Anonymous ID: fa14e8 May 14, 2020, 1:32 p.m. No.9173926   🗄️.is 🔗kun

And a word about testifying before Congress of the Senate.

Political Theater

Things do get revealed.

For what it's worth - items go into the official record.

But,

[These DS Clowns] - "Testifying"?

It would be like [Lois Lerner's] "Testimony".

"On the advice of my counsel, I choose to exercise my 5th Amendment right to remain silent."

They've all "Lawyered Up".

 

The only talk any of them will be doing is to save their skin if they can.

"No Deals" makes that possibility seem mighty slim.