Anonymous ID: 2c8788 May 14, 2020, 8:10 p.m. No.9179222   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9226 >>9238 >>9308 >>9345

Something I've been thinking about lately, have you noticed how POTUS and others are talking about Obummer and Biden etc? Pretty open. Would they be able to do that if they didn't have the proof of what they were saying? Would they do that if there was a current ongoing investigation. Would they do that if an investigation was over and they had all the proof they needed?

 

Boomity boom boom

Anonymous ID: 2c8788 May 14, 2020, 8:17 p.m. No.9179308   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9179222

Have you also noticed how most of the corrupt media doesn't call them out on that? We all know that if they have even the SLIGHTEST thing they could use against POTUS, they will use it. They tried using a phone call to try and impeach him for heavens sake, why wouldn't they try and get him for slander? Maybe because they KNOW he has the proof and don't want to bring that into the pubic narrative.