>WHO Boss, Roberto Azevedo, steps down before term ends
TYB
Point of clarification it is WTOnotWHO
Filtered 16 posts back
May need to have site owners notified to edit the streams that collect and post notables
In most cases the posts are the responsibility of the individual posting.
Since Jim had to testify in front of Congress imagine there are eyes on individuals like the anon calling for violence.
It is by far not the first time.
>You know, like they were with 8Chan.
That wasn't done in court it was done by tech overlord/companies outside of the law.
https://technology.findlaw.com/modern-law-practice/understanding-the-legal-issues-for-social-networking-sites-and.html
Section 230
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Actimmunizes websites from certain liability when they publish information
provided by another source. This usually arises in the context of defamation, privacy, negligence, and other tort claims. It
does not, however, cover criminal liability, copyright infringement, or other intellectual property claims.
Thus, if a user posts defamatory or otherwise illegal content, Section 230 shields the social network provider from certain
liability arising out of the publication. Websites that, in whole or in part, create or develop contested information, on the
other hand, are deemed "content providers" that do not benefit from the protections of Section 230.