Apparently you need extra dots to follow so I will break this down into even smaller pieces.
There are two issues…previous claims which were the point of the OP and current situation of WAR that you claim and use as an excuse to ignore the previous claims.
The previous claims are the previous claims. The current situation is showing those were not true and correct…even your claim of WAR and casualties provides additional proof of that.
Get it?
Great point. Indeed that was accepted.
However, it was not the point.
There are mutually exclusive claims on the table. Both cannot be true and correct or accurate.
What is the problem with being honest and acknowledging that, namely the inaccuracy and/or errors of previous claims in relation to the current situation and reality?
Why is that so difficult for people? Yes, shit happens. Not facing it…ignoring it, making excuses, "filtering" or whatever places limitations on future successes.
As previously posted a few times, previous claims of being in control, safe, etc and WAR with all the associated claims made by other anons do not fit together.
Either under control and safe OR WAR and associated casualties to be expected (as noted by other anons)….but it cannot be both.
Certainly you could read it that way, but that was a choice made by you after attaching additional text, context or claims not present in at least several of the original claims AS WRITTEN.
Taking text and verbal communications as stated is the procedural accepted standard, the default, if you will.