>>9188135 pb
People who are authorized to unmask can unmask and no crime. The crime would be if someone not qualified used someone elses name to unmask
>>9188135 pb
People who are authorized to unmask can unmask and no crime. The crime would be if someone not qualified used someone elses name to unmask
>Attention: Anyone who thinks they'll just 'wear down' the support for Bakers is going to have a very frustrating couple of weeks.
>We're NOT letting you abuse our Bakers. We will fight THIS FIGHT for as long as it takes.
^^^ THIS!!!
I dont know where this negative attitude towards the Bakers all of a sudden came from, but GTFO if youre gonna come here and bash the bakers
>not correct. They can only unmask for authorized reasons. Spying on a campaign is not an authorized reason.
Well they wouldve set it up to where there was a reason (even if they manufactured it).. so it was more than just spying on Trump campaign. Unmasking was not illegal. leaking to WaPo WAS
>Unauthorized reasons equal unauthorized use
Anon, Walmart can barely get people to wear pants inside :D
"Its time to end this horror show now"
Yeah lets see how long it takes. Now is a good time
Anon, thoughts on when HRC is announced as Dem candidate…
Before Convention?
During Convention?
I feel like if its a surprise sprung on everyone at the Convention, it will shock everyone and not have a positive effect. Maybe Biden gets removed before the convention, so there is a short time period of NO candidate, and just announced that the new candidate will be announced AT the convention… so everyone knows SOMEONE will be announced
The past few days there has been an unusual spike in baker abuse… above the norm. Ive been here since dec 2017
Yep it happens…. not often, but it does happen, and will happen. nobody is perfect
Did you follow the whole convo, or just jump in for the middle?? I literally said the unmasking wasnt the crime, but the leaking the convo to WaPo was, dumbass. Go back to your Phonics book
Ah I missed that. Yeah not cool
KEK anon… yeah gotta fit in :D
Over 17,000 unmaskings just last year, by TRUMP's NSA and admin. Unmasking isnt a crime… the illegal FISA in the first place was a crime.. leaking to WAPO was a crime
We need to find a pic of Kayleigh in a bikini
END THE HORROR SHOW
Oh Yes i completely agree with you, but we have to go by the perspective of what the general public knows…. not what WE know.
Obama expelled Kislyak, which made him call Flynn. That is harmless. and good luck proving Obama called him to spur the call to Flynn, unless documentation (emails, text messages, etc).
You touched on something that nobody else has asked. If Flynn was masked, that means he was incidental pickup for a FISA for someone else.. we have to assume Kislyak. If Kislyak, the unmasking of Flynn (not knowing its Flynn) is believable and would stand legit.