>>9195389

>>9195419

I agree - and he needs that answer in response to his tweet requesting feedback whether he should 'publish it' or not.

It looks like at least one or two anons have replied in that vein.

https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1261474849479950336?s=20

>>9195693

Same - I think it's the truth. But he's got to provide evidence.