Anonymous ID: 59e0bf April 6, 2018, 9:13 a.m. No.919753   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9776 >>9969

So NYT tried 2 things

 

  • Breaking the plausible diability connections between Q and the WH (trying by calling 4 confirmation)

 

  • Setting up plausible deniablity themselves, by calling it a conspiracy theory.

 

At the risk of it going even more mainstream, now many more normies know about Q