>>919516 (prev)
Now THERE'S a ding-bat in the know.
No wonder he draws his sustenance from the NewWeek teet.
>>919516 (prev)
Now THERE'S a ding-bat in the know.
No wonder he draws his sustenance from the NewWeek teet.
Not sure what you were attempting to do here, but you FAILED ! !
Unless you wanted to look like a retarded glowing nigger.
I'm on the East Coast and Thankfully, I don't see it.
Not necessarily. We knew the cat would be out of the bag at some point. Maybe Q just kicked them in the balls.
What if the NYT never called the Whitehouse, and yet Q just posted that here for shits and giggles to let them know, that he knows, and that we knows, and now they knows too?
BWAAHAAhahahaha This IS quite entertaining.
Largely because (((they))) don't like it.
Been here since Oct and was being serious, why you perceive I'm shilling?
Turnabout is fair play; not that it would need to be at this point.
Maybe nobody bothers to even comment there because they are the 'Failing NY Times', so the employees leave those comments to make it look like somebody actually reads that rag AND makes it look read for the advertiser's benefit.