Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 15, 2020, 11:27 p.m. No.9196943   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6967 >>7262

>>9196917

>what baker is this?

kekking….

we're gettin' to be a suspicious lot around here, aren't we?

maybe it's three straight days of shilly bakes.

>>9196859

If you don't want to give a baker name, maybe you could post a pastebin or say something to let anons know you're legit.

Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 15, 2020, 11:41 p.m. No.9197015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7020

>>9196967

>what baker are you?

<what kind of question is this?

It's a serious question, baker. Not meant as an insult but bc of bakers with Guest pastebin accounts fucking up the multiple doughs for several days running. The integrity of the breads is the responsibility not just of bakers but all anons. "Eyes on" was meant for situations like this.

o7

Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 15, 2020, 11:48 p.m. No.9197053   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7075

>>9197020

this is another baker, i think i recognize your style as familiar but that's just a guess. Spent earlier today trying to run down what was going on with the bakes. If you haven't baked for a few days, it's been a real shitshow. Here, i'll attach a coupla caps posted on bakers meta in /comms/ so you can see. It's actually a very good thing that anons challenge bakers under the circumstances.

Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 16, 2020, 12:05 a.m. No.9197170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7182 >>7190

>>9197075

I don't have a blame game going, baker. In fact, just the opposite. I'm mostly trying to make sure there is no blame prematurely assigned to any party for things unproven.

 

But anyone who signs on as baker needs to expect to be greeted by alert and responsible anons, not complacency. Would you expect any less??

Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 16, 2020, 12:19 a.m. No.9197248   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7265

>>9197182

OSS - that is a long story. Proficient baker.

You might consider me part of the "ebonics crew" so maybe you don't want to be asking me that question. Different situations call for a different dialect.

Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 16, 2020, 12:28 a.m. No.9197312   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9197292

not sure when sgrvl started qanonresearch on endchan but think it was after 8 went down. definitely didn't take off until mid-sept, breads were several days long til then, began to pick up after anons realized 8 wasn't coming back right after Sept 5.

Anonymous ID: 356d30 May 16, 2020, 12:37 a.m. No.9197370   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7382 >>7415

>>9197346

No, it was the opposite if anything. CM was warning people off from platforms he could not vouch for. The only one advocating for qanonresearch endchan was sgrvl. Met up with him on VOAT after six weeks of misery on VOAT and Twatter. Endchan was a useful place to do work but only until 8 returned.