Trump Tweet, additional take:

Trump team catches another leaker AND teaches Lou Dobbs not to trust his 'source'? The source clearly told Dobbs that Trump 'was set' to re-introduce funding to WHO at 10% of what it was to match China's $ amount?

Questions that MAY LOOK LIKE STATEMENTS: The entirety of the below is in the form of a question:

It was an option DISCUSSED but I don't know who raised that as a possibility among many at that meeting, nor do I know what kind of analysis they did on ALL MATTERS at that meeting, either the really moronic knee-jerk style that does not take into account ALL the facts, including facts that may have arisen in the last 24 hour period that changes everything about the matter, or, the better method, to FIRST MAKE SURE WE HAVE ALL THE RELEVANT FACTS BEFORE DECIDING ON BEHALF OF 350 MILLION CITIZENS, including everything that has occurred at the WHO over the last couple of months due to corruption disclosure, we don't know, so IF the discussion included an analysis of the "tradeoffs" of going from $ 400 million to $0 vs $400 million to $40 million to match China, if for argument's sake I was at that meeting, and after it I SEE someone who claims to know about what Trump team decided TELL another, that "the decision has been made and this is what it is", I would quite likely call that person a corrupt swamp rat for misleading whoever they were talking to, LIKE A JOURNALIST, as a means to set them up and encourage them to publish the news and stake one's credibility on it, not because that journalist is bad but BECAUSE they are good and that swamp rat leaker told the lie so as to also tarnish that journalist with bad OPTICS (REMEMBER OPTICS, which is the risk of how a well planned and likely to succeed GOOD plan MAY APPEAR to the public).

And this can occur in both 'directions', what may look like a good journalist may be feeding intentional falsehoods but the viewers can't 'see' it because they lack the full knowledge of the journalist's true motivations, partial ignorance is true for all of us around the world, about any one person or group of people.

So what may LOOK like Dobbs publishing false information and being sloppy, I necessarily have it all incomplete so the implication of my initial choice set as one that looks to me what it was, I could be less right or more right based on what I know up to this point, as full as it can be and incomplete as it is compared to the impossible, omnipotence.

It could look to me as something other than a well intended and likely to succeed good plan due to what I think both Trump team's and Dobbs' true full motivations that are attached to their statements and actions that I see and hope to have a more correct and less incorrect understanding not for their sake exclusively but to also my own because I want to not adversely affect people who I may not know but I still don't just want to cavalierly harm them with me knowing I am but I choose not to stop, I don't want to be that person…call it anything that unites us all as wanting the better for the most people and that only requires me to understand nothing at all except knowing that I am a better person when I choose to understand everyone else as bring motivated in ways that COULD make a crude, basic, necessarily wrong because it is necessarily self-aware as being incomplete according to its own account generic understanding of the whole motivation completely erasing reason and leaving 'flight or flight' knee jerk reaction that then clouds the mind and makes it harder to know the real truth which is that the LOUDEST 'flight or flight' voices are those who want to deny you your own ability to know right and wrong 'facts' based on empirical evidence, logic, and their necessary dependency reason, that cognitive aspect that even the smartest most widely advertised, narrative, first before new facts understanding, cannot know about YOU, YOU AS WHO YOU ARE TO YOURSELF IN ADDITION TO WHAT IT MIGHT LOOK LIKE TO OTHERS.

The more I go 'inward', the more I see and understand more people around me, because there is a lot to me that others don't know, and yes, there is a lot others know that I don't about them. I don't say 'a lot' out of whatever 'fight or flight' alleged motivation that may appear to a reader who adjudicates quicker than I would have about my full motivations, I recognize more motivations happening in more people and I mean that in a good way, because you know that I know that you know that whatever it looks like we are doing, and it could be very accurately described but I can't help it when others lie, tradeoffs MAY LOOK TO YOU AND I as doing but we were wrong because our judgement is necessarily based on some positive amount of ignorance of a person's FULL KNOWLEDGE that may become attached to their own actions, and don't forget risk of efficacy of fake news spin)

and hence not to trust that source at all?