>>919167

No, actually I am not. I am simply accepting the words provided at face value, nothing more, nothing less. Realize it or not, you are assigning additional meaning, content and context not provided. While that is perfectly acceptable, that action, both actions, in fact, deserve recognition for exactly what they are.

Why is that a problem that requires defense, ignorance or other? Why not just accept and use it as information?

Funny how so many can't or refuse to see and accept the simple reality and baby steps.

>>919456

Yes, actually that would be the expected response or action. NOT seeing it as such suggests NOT understanding the left.

>>920584

>>920468

The most unfortunate part is that doing so is perceived as a threat, accusation, attack, not included, etc., and responded to accordingly with fallacies (ad hominem, labels, strawmen, etc…) resulting in missing the opportunity which shorts all parties and the common goals.

>>920587

Yes! That right there is a perfect response and example of reading and accepting the words as written.

Great response, anon!

>>920986

Many options and easy ways to cut them off at the knees and prevent that.