Anonymous ID: bbcff2 May 16, 2020, 4:20 p.m. No.9204257   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9204207

Stolen.

Idea :

1) Put in a single tweet about 6 “#ObamaGates”

2) Follow that with whatever they have trending to combat it ex : #ObamaCommencement2020

3) Will make it to normies feeds

4) even the Japanese/Middle Eastern trends

5) they can shadow Obamagate but will they shadow their own trends if they were hijacked?

Anonymous ID: bbcff2 May 16, 2020, 4:50 p.m. No.9204574   🗄️.is 🔗kun

U.S. lawmakers say with new technology, it’s time to inspect all inbound containers

 

However, the Department of

Homeland Security waived the 100 percent scanning law for the third time

which was originally scheduled to be implemented four years ago in reaction to 9/11.

By Eric Kulisch |Thursday, August 18, 2016| American Shipper

International shippers and freight transportation providers can be forgiven for assuming that the 2007 U.S. congressional mandate to scan every inbound ocean container at a foreign port before loading on a ship had quietly died.

The Department of Homeland Security this spring used its right to waive the requirement for the third time and extend the inspection deadline another two years. Officials have consistently maintained that the law cannot be implemented because of logistical, technological, diplomatic, environmental, funding and other challenges associated with convincing foreign terminals and border authorities to set up non-intrusive imaging equipment and drive-through radiation detection machines in overseas ports to check every cargo box. Besides costing billions of dollars, such a security regime would dramatically slow cargo processing, increase costs, and disrupt trade, experts say.

The 100 percent scanning law, originally scheduled to be implemented four years ago, was passed in reaction to 9/11 and concerns that terrorists would use containers to smuggle nuclear weapons, radiological materials, explosives, or fighters themselves into the United States for an attack. The threat of smuggled radiological materials, or nuclear weapons, falling into the hands of terrorists is growing as ungoverned spaces and entrenched corruption in many regions of the world create terrorist safe havens, massive migration from parts of the Middle East overwhelms governments and their border controls, and Russia’s decision to halt most nuclear security cooperation with the United States leads to concerns about ongoing security of materials in that country, according to the National Nuclear Security Administration.

In the years following enactment of the scan-all law, many lawmakers softened their stance and appeared to accept the DHS position that implementing across-the-board container inspections was unrealistic given the millions of containers moving through U.S. ports each year.

But it’s an issue that won’t go away, to the chagrin of many in the business community.

A handful of vocal House Democrats are insisting that DHS follow through with implementing the comprehensive inspection mandate for ocean cargo, saying that department explanations for postponing action ring hollow.

At a July joint committee hearing, Rep. Janice Hahn, who represents the district where the Port of Long Beach is located, said she did not believe administration claims that technology doesn’t exist to efficiently run all inbound containers through X-ray and radiation detection machines.

“I believe there is technology that exists today that will keep us safe, but will not slow commerce down,” she said. “Our ports are some of our most vulnerable entry points in our country. Until we act on what Congress decided, I don’t think we’re going to have the safety and security that we need.”

 

http://www.westarusa.com/u-s-lawmakers-say-new-technology-time-inspect-inbound-containers/

 

-Johnson

-Kelly

-Nielsen